Re: port-for-each vs lazy sweep

[Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl>]

Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>> @@ -472,6 +480,7 @@ scm_i_init_guile (SCM_STACKITEM *base)
>>    scm_init_backtrace ();	/* Requires fluids */
>>    scm_init_fports ();
>>    scm_init_strports ();
>> +  scm_init_ports ();
>>    scm_init_gdbint ();           /* Requires strports */
>>    scm_init_hash ();
>>    scm_init_hashtab ();
>> @@ -490,7 +499,6 @@ scm_i_init_guile (SCM_STACKITEM *base)
>>    scm_init_numbers ();
>>    scm_init_options ();
>>    scm_init_pairs ();
>> -  scm_init_ports ();
> 
> Why does it need to be moved?

because gdb instantiates a port; I forgot why it used to work
though.

>> -  SCM_SETPTAB_ENTRY (port, pt);
>> +  SCM_SETPTAB_ENTRY(port, pt);
> 
> Please follow GNU style.

I have the impression that GUILE isn't really consistent 

[lilydev@haring libguile]$ grep '[A-Z](' *c|grep -v define|wc
    394    2037   24632
[lilydev@haring libguile]$ grep '[a-z](' *c|grep -v define|wc
    490    3038   28008

time for a grand search & replace patch?

>> -#ifdef GUILE_DEBUG
>>  /* Functions for debugging.  */
> 
> Why remove the `#ifdef'?

oops.

> 
>> --- a/m4/gnulib-cache.m4
>> +++ b/m4/gnulib-cache.m4
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ gl_MODULES([alloca strcase])
>>  gl_AVOID([])
>>  gl_SOURCE_BASE([lib])
>>  gl_M4_BASE([m4])
>> +gl_PO_BASE([])
> 
> This is unrelated.

yes, I know. Too lazy to strip this from the output.  But won't apply to CVS.

-- 
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen



_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel