From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: deprecated features Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:51:18 +0100 Message-ID: <45B55C06.2000603@xs4all.nl> References: <871wlprck9.fsf@chbouib.org> <45B4C7A0.5020302@xs4all.nl> <87tzyiwzwv.fsf@zip.com.au> Reply-To: hanwen@xs4all.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169513501 13482 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2007 00:51:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 23 01:51:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H99sp-0000eG-C2 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:51:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H99sp-0007fZ-0j for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:51:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H99sl-0007f8-FG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:51:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H99si-0007ci-NN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:51:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H99si-0007cc-Fk for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:51:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H99sh-0006U0-Qv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:51:24 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H99sb-00047i-FX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:51:17 +0100 Original-Received: from muurbloem.xs4all.nl ([213.84.26.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:51:17 +0100 Original-Received: from hanwen by muurbloem.xs4all.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:51:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: muurbloem.xs4all.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) In-Reply-To: <87tzyiwzwv.fsf@zip.com.au> X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6473 Archived-At: Kevin Ryde escreveu: >> does this also mean that we can (finally!) summarily throw away anything >> that is marked as "deprecated GUILE 1.7" ? > > The short answer would be no, much too soon. The whole idea of If not now, is there any sort of timescale for when this is scheduled? I think it is reasonable to let deprecated interfaces live for one stable release, to allow people to update broken programs, and remove them after that. Marius? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel