From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Eval options macro: backward compatibility? Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:18:08 +0100 Message-ID: <45B4C7A0.5020302@xs4all.nl> References: <871wlprck9.fsf@chbouib.org> Reply-To: hanwen@xs4all.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169475538 1097 80.91.229.12 (22 Jan 2007 14:18:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 22 15:18:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H900Y-0004w8-Vq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:18:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H900Y-0005Un-El for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:18:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H900S-0005QG-Bs for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:18:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H900Q-0005Ok-Ov for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:18:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H900Q-0005OU-5t for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:18:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H900O-00044l-Mm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:18:41 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H9009-000627-6t for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:18:25 +0100 Original-Received: from muurbloem.xs4all.nl ([213.84.26.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:18:25 +0100 Original-Received: from hanwen by muurbloem.xs4all.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:18:25 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: muurbloem.xs4all.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) In-Reply-To: <871wlprck9.fsf@chbouib.org> X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6463 Archived-At: Ludovic Courtès escreveu: > Hi, > > Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > >> this order is awkward when a new trap option has to be added. >> >> The problematic thing is that this is exported to GUILE users, through >> >> #define SCM_ENTER_FRAME_P scm_evaluator_trap_table[1].val >> >> in eval.h >> >> I would like to change this order, and if possible move this out of >> the global namespace. Are there any objections? > > It's ok for 1.9 to break binary compatibility, and it's also probably a > good thing to not export things that are not documented. So I think does this also mean that we can (finally!) summarily throw away anything that is marked as "deprecated GUILE 1.7" ? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel