Re: [ntp:hackers/Guile devel] ntp-dev changes

[Bruce Korb <bkorb@gnu.org>]

Rob Browning wrote:
> Bruce Korb <bkorb@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> 
>>Guile folks, please, how is this supposed to work? The guile.c
>>module needs to see all three of these code fragments to compile
>>correctly.  Anyway, for me it builds with GCC 3.x and fails with
>>4.x, but looks like it should fail no matter what the compiler. What
>>gives?
> 
> 
> I think this may have been fixed in 1.6 CVS.  If so, the 1.6.8-rc1
> test archive that I recently announced should contain the changes.

I haven't pulled CVS, but if this crucial "fix" is simply:

$ diff -u $(find guile-1.6.7  guile-1.6.7-build -name guile.c)
--- guile-1.6.7/libguile/guile.c        2002-12-07 14:41:32.000000000 -0800
+++ guile-1.6.7-build/libguile/guile.c  2006-04-16 09:48:21.402050194 -0700
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@
  {
  #ifdef DYNAMIC_LINKING
    /* libtool automagically inserts this variable into your executable... */
-  extern const scm_lt_dlsymlist lt_preloaded_symbols[];
-  scm_lt_dlpreload_default (lt_preloaded_symbols);
+  extern const int lt_preloaded_symbols;
+  scm_lt_dlpreload_default ((scm_lt_dlsymlist*)&lt_preloaded_symbols);
  #endif
    scm_boot_guile (argc, argv, inner_main, 0);
    return 0; /* never reached */

then it would be "really nice" to bump out a 1.6 & 1.8 patch asap
and include any other more destabilizing fixes in a later patch.
Thanks - Bruce


_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel