From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: No way out. Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:58:33 +0100 Message-ID: <43956ED9.2070909@xs4all.nl> References: <200511301616.22258.bkorb@gnu.org> <87lkz5mysf.fsf@zip.com.au> <200512042008.00333.bkorb@gnu.org> <87psobp4mz.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133877912 23824 80.91.229.2 (6 Dec 2005 14:05:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 15:05:10 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjdQC-00033S-Rj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:03:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjdOa-0003FV-VY for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 09:02:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjbKP-0003Ai-I4 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 06:49:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjbIS-0002a2-4d for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 06:48:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjaX2-0007UX-3q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 05:58:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EjaXg-0003Xr-Sm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 05:59:29 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EjaWJ-0003JI-LQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:58:03 +0100 Original-Received: from muurbloem.xs4all.nl ([213.84.26.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:58:03 +0100 Original-Received: from hanwen by muurbloem.xs4all.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:58:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: muurbloem.xs4all.nl User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <87psobp4mz.fsf@zip.com.au> X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5461 Archived-At: Kevin Ryde wrote: > Bruce Korb writes: > >> I should be getting stack traces on Scheme errors. I'm not. >> (And, yes, I invoke either ``(backtrace)'' or ``scm_backtrace()'' >> when a failure is detected.) > > > I think I've been having trouble with backtraces not appearing too > (just from plain scheme code) but I didn't know where to look for > what's wrong. Backtraces haven't been appearing since I started using 1.7, for over a year See also, http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2005-05/msg00010.html -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel