From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: module GC bug
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 20:50:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42DAA874.4020900@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877jfqh93q.fsf@zagadka.de>
Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl> writes:
>
>
>>what happens if the weak (c[ad]r ITEM) is marked through a postponed
>>weak vector that you haven't processed yet? Then P is removed
>>erroneously, or am I missing something?
>
>
> Hmm, you are right. I first have thought about this behavior as a
> feature, but I now see that it is in fact not wanted. The order the
> weak vectors are processed in affects the result, which is not good,
> obviously.
>
> Right now, I hope to get around this by repeatedly scanning all weak
> vectors until no new markings have taken place, and only then remove
> the unmarked items.
Hi;
isn't it possible to store the 'module property in a doubly weak hash
table? What you propose sounds very costly , and my gut instinct says
that I can punch a hole in it as well.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out!
>
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-17 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-09 23:32 module GC bug Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-06-10 6:32 ` Neil Jerram
2005-06-10 11:48 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-06-19 13:32 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-06-19 17:33 ` Rob Browning
2005-07-07 18:48 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-06-24 17:50 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-07 18:42 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-07-08 9:24 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2005-07-09 8:28 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-09 19:28 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2005-07-09 23:25 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-10 8:16 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2005-07-09 23:32 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-10 8:17 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2005-07-08 21:43 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-13 21:02 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-07-13 22:19 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-16 18:57 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-07-17 18:50 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys [this message]
2005-07-17 20:44 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-07-18 13:43 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-08-01 0:20 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-08-01 11:04 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-08-10 22:29 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-08-15 23:57 ` Rob Browning
2005-08-16 0:10 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-08-16 0:16 ` Rob Browning
2005-08-28 23:31 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
[not found] ` <42EE63F9.4080102@xs4all.nl>
2005-08-02 19:14 ` Marius Vollmer
[not found] ` <42F1DF3E.70204@xs4all.nl>
2005-08-05 14:48 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42DAA874.4020900@xs4all.nl \
--to=hanwen@xs4all.nl \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).