From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de>
Subject: Re: module GC bug
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 10:28:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42CF8AA5.1080300@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66e540fe05070802241cbf85ad@mail.gmail.com>
Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> On 7/7/05, Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de> wrote:
>
>>>I've fixed this by introducing a new function (eval-closure-module)
>>>which returns the module of a closure via the eval-closure smob.
>>
>>I think the right fix is to change the weak hashtable marking
>>algorithm to properly cope with circular references like this. I will
>>try this and then come back to you. (I don't know how long this might
>>take since the required changes look to be slightly non-trivial (but
>>entirely possible).)
>
>
> That would be good, because the current fix (which is already
> committed to CVS HEAD, and which removes the setting of the
> procedure-property) still leaves code in modules.c which expects the
> procedure-property to be set. If Han-Wen's fix is to be kept, then
> you should, at least, remove that code. The consequence is that it
> will no longer be possible to lookup the module of the eval closure
> for any kind of closures except the standard ones (which are
> implemented as a smob).
Hi,
I guess I'm missing something. Where is the 'module procedure property
set for other eval closures?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-09 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-09 23:32 module GC bug Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-06-10 6:32 ` Neil Jerram
2005-06-10 11:48 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-06-19 13:32 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-06-19 17:33 ` Rob Browning
2005-07-07 18:48 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-06-24 17:50 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-07 18:42 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-07-08 9:24 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2005-07-09 8:28 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys [this message]
2005-07-09 19:28 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2005-07-09 23:25 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-10 8:16 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2005-07-09 23:32 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-10 8:17 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2005-07-08 21:43 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-13 21:02 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-07-13 22:19 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-16 18:57 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-07-17 18:50 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-07-17 20:44 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-07-18 13:43 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-08-01 0:20 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-08-01 11:04 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-08-10 22:29 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-08-15 23:57 ` Rob Browning
2005-08-16 0:10 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-08-16 0:16 ` Rob Browning
2005-08-28 23:31 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
[not found] ` <42EE63F9.4080102@xs4all.nl>
2005-08-02 19:14 ` Marius Vollmer
[not found] ` <42F1DF3E.70204@xs4all.nl>
2005-08-05 14:48 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42CF8AA5.1080300@xs4all.nl \
--to=hanwen@xs4all.nl \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=mvo@zagadka.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).