From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Can't make a stack from a continuation Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:50:46 +0000 Message-ID: <41CD4606.3080606@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <41A23580.6070702@ossau.uklinux.net> <41A635F5.2030303@ossau.uklinux.net> <41C2398D.9040402@ossau.uklinux.net> <41CCA0B5.2070107@ossau.uklinux.net> <87652rqo3k.fsf@zagadka.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103972252 10740 80.91.229.6 (25 Dec 2004 10:57:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 25 11:57:26 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ci9bx-0000h4-00 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 11:57:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ci9mT-0005hS-6L for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 06:08:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Ci9je-00059k-2I for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 06:05:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Ci9ja-000573-0h for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 06:05:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ci9jY-000549-Ja; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 06:05:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ci9Vq-0005s0-8X; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 05:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-130-27-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.130.27.25]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E91409FB5; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A816FD61; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:50:46 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041007 Debian/1.7.3-5 X-Accept-Language: en Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87652rqo3k.fsf@zagadka.de> X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:2352 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4583 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4583 Marius Vollmer wrote: > > Hmm, I didn't really try to debug your patch. I followed its idea of > also relocating dframe->vect and made the changes that seemed right. > > Using offset = SCM_CONTREGS (stack)->stack - SCM_BASE(stack) looks > right. The bug is probably elsewhere... Fair enough, but when I compared your and my patches, they were identical except for - the offset calculation and storage - two occurrences of x->id instead of x[0].id. And I thought that mine didn't work ... Anyway, as long as yours does work now, it's probably not worth worrying about this further; it may be that I had an inconsistent build, or LD_LIBRARY not set properly, or something. Neil _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile