From: Dirk Herrmann <dirk@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de>
Subject: Re: segfault in CVS HEAD
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:00:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41270129.7080309@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40E2917A.7010106@ccrma>
Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
> There's still one case where the lambda tag appears --
> if you include a documentation string:
>
> guile> (define (hi) "this is a comment" 34)
> guile> (procedure-source hi)
> (lambda () "this is a comment" #@lambda 34)
>
> Also I notice that "let" is sometimes changed to "let*", and
> in the define* case I get "(lambda lambda*:G0 (let-optional*
> lambda*:G0" etc.
Sorry for the delay. I have submitted a patch, that fixes the
documentation string issue.
Regarding let being changed to let*: As far as I know, guile has always
done such conversions in certain circumstances, not just since my recent
changes. In the medium term, there will probably even more of such
conversions be introduced, since they are intended as optimizations. Do
the recent changes introduce a problem for you, or was this just to be
seen as a general comment? If it is a problem for you, could you please
give more details and also some examples?
Thanks a lot, and sorry again for the delay until I fixed the code.
Best regards,
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-21 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <40DD5A64.60300@ccrma>
[not found] ` <40DEC836.3010806@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de>
[not found] ` <40E2917A.7010106@ccrma>
2004-07-14 7:22 ` segfault in CVS HEAD Dirk Herrmann
2004-07-14 12:36 ` Dale P. Smith
2004-08-21 8:00 ` Dirk Herrmann [this message]
2004-08-23 10:43 ` Bill Schottstaedt
2004-06-12 21:12 Han-Wen Nienhuys
2004-06-12 21:14 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2004-06-12 22:26 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2004-06-20 7:15 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-06-20 20:43 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2004-06-21 21:08 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-06-22 10:12 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2004-06-22 20:31 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2004-06-26 6:02 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-06-26 8:26 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41270129.7080309@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de \
--to=dirk@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).