From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dirk Herrmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: typechecking Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 09:05:11 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <40BAD927.1000003@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> References: <16486.52591.672130.224861@localhost.localdomain> <87brkwc6f7.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <16544.2271.454230.492574@localhost.localdomain> <40A5DFF2.80004@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> <16564.54949.13882.819772@localhost.localdomain> <40B99DE9.8010005@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> <16569.39703.372961.365613@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085985615 10821 80.91.224.253 (31 May 2004 06:40:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 06:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile-Devel Mailing List Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 31 08:40:07 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BUgSt-0003zb-00 for ; Mon, 31 May 2004 08:40:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUgT3-00058S-GD for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 02:40:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUgRn-0004dK-Rs for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 02:39:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUgRl-0004aR-6H for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 02:38:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUgRk-0004a6-Tn for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 02:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.171] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BUgRF-0003EK-UR for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 02:38:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BUgRE-0004NK-00; Mon, 31 May 2004 08:38:24 +0200 Original-Received: from [80.131.36.141] (helo=dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BUgRE-0004lk-00; Mon, 31 May 2004 08:38:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040220 X-Accept-Language: de, en Original-To: hanwen@xs4all.nl In-Reply-To: <16569.39703.372961.365613@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.8.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:494e3e4d1bf8dc247959c49e6f1f4215 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3777 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3777 Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > I understand the tag system, so I'm aware of the implications. [...] Sure you do. Sorry if this sounded if I thought you didn't. I am always somewhat verbose when mailing to the list, even when mailing to guile-devel: I try to make it possible for many people to follow the discussion. And guile-devel, to my knowledge, is open for everyone interested. Sorry again for not making this clear in my post. > However, I was wondering whether such a change stands a chance of > being incorporated, if it would work. I think this can't be answered before actually having tried it out and knowing about whether it brings any benefit. Trying it out, however, would bring some benefit itself: It would help to identify places in guile, where code circumvents using the low-level access macros and allow to bring guile to a state where such experiments would be easier in the future. Best regards Dirk _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel