From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dirk Herrmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: cvs compile error Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 09:28:12 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <40B83B8C.9020205@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> References: <16563.3918.589104.610334@localhost.localdomain> <40B5031B.3050205@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> <16565.1668.823273.705490@localhost.localdomain> <40B838D9.6060509@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085814162 7992 80.91.224.253 (29 May 2004 07:02:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 07:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 29 09:02:35 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTxrW-0002k8-00 for ; Sat, 29 May 2004 09:02:34 +0200 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mailman.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BTxra-0005OR-Nx for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 03:02:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BTxrU-0005OM-4R for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 03:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BTxrS-0005OA-1F for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 03:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BTxrR-0005O6-7S for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 03:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.186] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BTxqU-0005vo-H7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2004 03:01:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BTxqT-0000BU-00; Sat, 29 May 2004 09:01:29 +0200 Original-Received: from [80.131.52.55] (helo=dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BTxqT-0007tg-00; Sat, 29 May 2004 09:01:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040220 X-Accept-Language: de, en Original-To: hanwen@xs4all.nl In-Reply-To: <40B838D9.6060509@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.8.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:494e3e4d1bf8dc247959c49e6f1f4215 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3771 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3771 Dirk Herrmann wrote: > Where the results on 3.4 different in any way? > > Could you please check if the problem could also be solved by the > patch below? > On my system, again, I don't get any warnings. It would also be nice > if you could > check whether the patch below brings any performance differences. Oops, please forget about my question above: Certainly my patch does not solve the problem that you had reported. Best regards, Dirk _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel