* Re: GC missed a reference
@ 2004-05-05 11:42 Bill Schottstaedt
2004-05-08 21:46 ` Marius Vollmer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bill Schottstaedt @ 2004-05-05 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
I wonder if this note to bug-guile got lost in the
shuffle?
From: Bill Schottstaedt
Subject: Re: GC missed a reference
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:25:11 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308
On the <GC missed a reference> bug reported earilier,
in hashtab.c, in rehash_after_gc, to_rehash is set to
SCM_EOL, the rehash list is processed, then the weak_hashtables
list is set to to_rehash -- this clobbers the entire list!
Subsequent GC's then start freeing everything in every
weak hash table, including the symbol table.
I think the line (287 in the version I have) should be:
weak_hashtables = last;
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-08 21:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-05 11:42 GC missed a reference Bill Schottstaedt
2004-05-08 21:46 ` Marius Vollmer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).