From: Dirk Herrmann <dirk@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Marius Vollmer <marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de>
Subject: Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:58:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <408807DA.2030307@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877jw87hjv.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>
Rob Browning wrote:
>On a related note, in many cases, I suspect all the user may really
>need is a cheap way to copy some offset + size chunk of the data into
>their own buffer, especially when dealing with homogeneous uint8
>arrays. If so, then it might make sense to provide a set of functions
>that can do that, handling whatever locking and memcpying is needed.
>
I agree. The need for the locking functions and the direct access to the
heap data seem only to be introduced to avoid allocating memory for
every new conversion. With Rob's suggestion, the user can provide a
buffer beforehand and have guile simply copy chunks of string contents
into that buffer. This is much cleaner, since it remains hidden how
guile represents strings internally, all locking (if necessary) can be
done by guile internally, and still the benefit is achieved that memory
allocation is avoided. There may still remain situations where this
approach will impose some performance penalty, but at some point we
simply must value our own development freedom and cleanlyness of design
over performance.
IMO, looking at the problems with the separation of memoization and
execution, the problems with the generational garbage collector, the
problems with the module system: If more internals of guile would have
remained hidden from the start, allowing us to optimize stuff behind the
scences, guile would have a much better performance today! I spend 90%
percent of the time that I work on the separation of memoization and
execution thinking how I can incrementally introduce my patches such
that the big incompatible change is postponed as late as possible.
Best regards
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-22 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-07 13:00 GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode) Marius Vollmer
2004-04-07 15:04 ` Paul Jarc
2004-04-13 13:25 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-04-13 15:54 ` Paul Jarc
2004-04-21 15:08 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-04-21 16:10 ` Paul Jarc
2004-04-21 18:06 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-04-21 16:31 ` Delivery failure (guile-devel@gnu.org) Bruce Korb
2004-04-21 21:34 ` GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode) Marius Vollmer
2004-04-21 21:46 ` Paul Jarc
2004-04-21 22:19 ` Dale P. Smith
2004-04-21 22:34 ` Paul Jarc
2004-04-21 23:02 ` Kevin Ryde
2004-04-22 17:36 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-04-22 18:31 ` Paul Jarc
2004-05-17 21:14 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-05-17 21:57 ` Bruce Korb
2004-05-18 9:54 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-04-22 17:00 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-04-24 10:06 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-04-24 19:46 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-04-25 20:33 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-04-25 21:38 ` Paul Jarc
2004-05-17 21:45 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-04-17 13:21 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-04-22 4:16 ` Rob Browning
2004-04-22 17:48 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-05-12 20:09 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-05-15 9:50 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-05-24 18:51 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-05-25 0:21 ` Paul Jarc
2004-05-26 21:27 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-06-03 21:40 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-06-04 6:52 ` tomas
2004-08-09 22:29 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-05-15 10:18 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-05-24 19:36 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-05-26 22:11 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-08-09 22:28 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-04-22 4:39 ` Rob Browning
2004-04-22 17:58 ` Dirk Herrmann [this message]
2004-04-23 0:25 ` Rob Browning
2004-04-23 16:57 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-04-23 17:16 ` Rob Browning
2004-05-17 21:24 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-04-23 17:36 ` Andreas Rottmann
2004-05-17 21:30 ` Marius Vollmer
2004-05-18 9:21 ` Andreas Rottmann
2004-04-25 7:54 ` Dirk Herrmann
2004-05-17 21:44 ` Marius Vollmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=408807DA.2030307@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de \
--to=dirk@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=marius.vollmer@uni-dortmund.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).