From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bruce Korb Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Delivery failure (guile-devel@gnu.org) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:31:09 -0700 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <4086A1BF.9C8F7914@veritas.com> References: Reply-To: bkorb@veritas.com NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1082565834 9197 80.91.224.253 (21 Apr 2004 16:43:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 21 18:43:44 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BGKp5-0007YL-00 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:43:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BGKnH-0000NN-By for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:41:51 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BGKma-0000DY-6C for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BGKlX-0007nL-4b for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:40:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [143.127.3.10] (helo=MTVMIME01.enterprise.veritas.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BGKka-00074T-T6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from megami.veritas.com (unverified) by MTVMIME01.enterprise.veritas.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with SMTP id for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:39:00 -0700 Original-Received: from localhost (1752 bytes) by megami.veritas.com via sendmail with P:stdio/R:smart_host/T:smtp (sender: ) (ident using unix) id for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:39:00 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #15 built 2001-Aug-30) Original-To: Marius Vollmer X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3614 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3614 Your message has encountered delivery problems to the following recipient(s): guile-devel@gnu.org Delivery failed 550 Invalid address in message header Final-Recipient: rfc822; guile-devel@gnu.org Action: failed Status: 2.0.0 (Success - no additional status information available) Remote-MTA: dns; mx20.gnu.org Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid address in message header Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:30:55 -0700 Subject: Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Marius Vollmer wrote: > Yes, well. I haven't made my mind up yet, but I tend to just use > scm_is_true and scm_is_false. It's not a big problem to be a little > unsymmetric, I'd say. I'd disagree. Any lack of symmetry requires increased knowledge and more care in usage. So, if ``scm_is_'' is implemented for nearly all types, then it needs to be implemented for them all. "All types except for bool" is too hard to remember. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel