From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Matt Wette Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:07:49 -0800 Message-ID: <4060B5E1-5E6B-400C-ABDC-C2A9BEB3E875@gmail.com> References: <07F04476-6837-4DBD-A7FB-525F3660982C@gmail.com> <20161213012455.EKTND.4212.root@cdptpa-web08> <98CCD0B6-7D9F-4357-B217-E4534ECB3549@gmail.com> <077181FC-63B7-4DBC-9E53-DA0D2D915530@gmail.com> <87k2azuxbb.fsf@dustycloud.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481944104 24773 195.159.176.226 (17 Dec 2016 03:08:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 03:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Christopher Allan Webber Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 17 04:08:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cI5M7-0003tp-NA for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 04:08:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35166 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cI5M5-0002kS-Sv for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 22:08:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43296) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cI5Lr-0002eX-B8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 22:08:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cI5Lm-0004Ij-Ck for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 22:07:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]:33727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cI5Lm-0004IH-6L for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 22:07:54 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id 144so5136843pfv.0 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:07:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=q2m6+aphTKRxLs6eC2KCQLmjPCh4PeFxM6SoutlkLhE=; b=PK/pNXlG8nukXUIxdFisdl/zjpVPpiPgn5J9bVSvrVf+ijCju0jSAuQCHfD0uYpTqN aNBFB6/Pddx7qJYabiYiZpld1QGKG1wBLed9UfE0/kynRStK9c40+xG3fpQg5V6tr6JI T+H0TUbdG0nMBTE88wKb+AnorrhFuB15DAhmvrNFlSr2ZzXT9NTjYr5NkKC7KvfxtjiD jeyrIUZHbIw6QM337gAJPPXZSe1+woo3Jmpioyjuyoa1IUHXcgj1TRvWKI1MdUKWUyqI v0DzxZ1CXdqLdcqzzGi8DfQXjRAs1oSAu12fLDBINcWNut0sQ3YoZhpG+T7hrwEcvTxH fQ/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=q2m6+aphTKRxLs6eC2KCQLmjPCh4PeFxM6SoutlkLhE=; b=jZEGoWQVMj5QKlx9HMrxIv9aqsIBL4LZJTKDBTnb7L1dayOzNh+uF1C1iWHcuOEBgP h+vEloqVPTLemzG33GmW8yf1gNRv2SAjshQ30xEVvoOc710EsjWU9hq+HGvlwDCph2pV 3K8uiK2r7FrW096oJ3QR6iOcM9Y1SR+oS/N83nKfgiJW+x/7qq0IB95o2EwnPvLB3c3n gExVXKr21X4s1EvUAamT3ldNBTVjONT5sL4VPsGxOnGP+CdE+sGUIj/IgrDo+qdG2rDd PnosooRDptv2ivcw97rstrDPEJzrUSHaIgBJVQ/EZ+GdB0d2enxeE/pulHfT9dvFbOgR LJTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02HHS/thU5kPGx2o8Dk8cKIjfNbFbhPNLU3GExgo/n6xCSKhLAWZUL9xV68SA/PaQ== X-Received: by 10.84.217.149 with SMTP id p21mr13672199pli.121.1481944073405; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:07:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from nautilus.championbroadband.com (216-165-246-244.championbroadband.com. [216.165.246.244]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 65sm14722504pfl.21.2016.12.16.19.07.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 19:07:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k2azuxbb.fsf@dustycloud.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18801 Archived-At: > On Dec 16, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Christopher Allan Webber = wrote: >=20 > Matt Wette writes: >=20 >>> On Dec 16, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Matt Wette = wrote: >>>=20 >>> OK. This is gonna be hard to trace down. >>>=20 >>> I am on a Mac running Sierra, 10.12.2. At work I am running 10.9 I = believe, and I see the same behavior. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> If I compile with gcc 6.2 or gcc4.9, but no extra flags besides = =E2=80=94prefix, I get the following failure: >>>=20 >>> FAIL: numbers.test: string->number: valid complex number strings >>>=20 >>> and trace this down to=20 >>>=20 >>> meta/guile -c '(display (eqv? (imag-part (string->number "#i1@-0")) = -0.0))' =3D> #f >>=20 >> I am now compiling with clang-3.9 and getting fatal errors. Stay = tuned =E2=80=A6 >=20 > Is clang supported? I didn't think it was. >=20 Maybe not, but it provides additional checks that may be catching = something. The error that is coming up is with respect to atomics in = atomics-internal.h. I believe C11 requires that the pointer arguments = be _Atomic but they are not. I am trying to build w/o the atomic = routines (using clang), but will retry with gcc.=