From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Linas Vepstas Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile 1.9.5 released (alpha) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:13:56 -0600 Message-ID: <3ae3aa420911290813t3916fef5p86ce91603413081c@mail.gmail.com> References: <87pr7genzj.fsf@gnu.org> <3ae3aa420911281455x74df662ao113bb6a33d62c363@mail.gmail.com> <87pr72xmki.fsf@gnu.org> <3ae3aa420911281724t32167ed8ofd4bdefa05531819@mail.gmail.com> <87ws19mrva.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: linasvepstas@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259511258 21113 80.91.229.12 (29 Nov 2009 16:14:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 29 17:14:10 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NEmPZ-0001qE-LY for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:14:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33665 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NEmPZ-0004Pq-5c for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:14:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEmPT-0004Pi-6q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:14:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEmPO-0004MP-Ki for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44746 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NEmPO-0004MC-Hu for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:13:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:39469) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NEmPN-0005LR-B3; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:13:57 -0500 Original-Received: by yxe5 with SMTP id 5so2830880yxe.24 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:13:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NNsbbnP+3VfRkZiC0xaR8K2gU7SB97orB1TdwMmHk4g=; b=bDEVwO+VP2wFDj49JBodWVKyDsTD74cwFq36xChN1LwKnv4xIhraR7AbsmBq6GYRC3 2DjdwWBmeE906SD6PixtU/IHvPRbWAY7HsQBTqulwDugCwRB6+8NpqqbGxC+9Cfl0Qo/ olmmmBTROC6ULBvxGmDgVubIZUTP7TixVWMF0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pXWgXwR//BEA8NMhL8dWpGs2rLvXcvtZjqDKqT8Owd3uAvUCKWhploEnHTwIXmvrJ6 az05hybBEcyc204vYFcXK+j0D7SNp4UW3JS1yZJ7MKMAg7Fd6yh7i59h53Bmpk8tB7R8 bAAqtsmlCh/EmskM07mJ/9DLtAhiskq7g1MPA= Original-Received: by 10.101.208.2 with SMTP id k2mr1190652anq.142.1259511236695; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:13:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ws19mrva.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9730 Archived-At: 2009/11/29 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s : > Hi, > > Linas Vepstas writes: > >> --- libguile/tags.h.orig =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A02009-11-28 19:18:36.0000000= 00 -0600 >> +++ libguile/tags.h =C2=A0 2009-11-28 19:18:52.000000000 -0600 >> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ >> =C2=A0/* This is the default, which provides an intermediate level of co= mpile time >> =C2=A0 * type checking while still resulting in very efficient code. >> =C2=A0 */ >> - =C2=A0 =C2=A0typedef struct { char scm_unused_field; } * SCM; >> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0typedef struct ___stuff___ { char scm_unused_field; } * S= CM; > > There must be something else because this is exactly the same as in 1.8 > and 1.9.4 and Lilypond compiles with these. Well, no, If I look at 1.8.7 I see the following in tags.h: typedef struct scm_unused_struct * SCM; or typedef scm_t_bits SCM; The struct is clearly named in this case. I did not look at 1.9.4. I provided a very short sample program that elicits the bug .. you can play with it. Running gcc -E on it quickly revealed what was happening. --linas