From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Linas Vepstas Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile 1.9.5 released (alpha) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:55:30 -0600 Message-ID: <3ae3aa420911281455x74df662ao113bb6a33d62c363@mail.gmail.com> References: <87pr7genzj.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: linasvepstas@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259448965 27679 80.91.229.12 (28 Nov 2009 22:56:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 28 23:55:58 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NEWCf-0006sb-Ja for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:55:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58972 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NEWCf-0005TL-6E for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:55:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEWCZ-0005TG-Us for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:55:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEWCU-0005Sg-3j for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:55:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47758 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NEWCT-0005Sd-U7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:55:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:36552) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NEWCS-0000D8-Cj; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:55:32 -0500 Original-Received: by yxe5 with SMTP id 5so2450461yxe.24 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:55:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9IyHa9HMYKtOBn/j13XTqjLBxdqbgKjKi50V1hkBWDo=; b=ZT1+ak6IDB+bLZI3qqyIY/aqiGAKQOjMBDZPJwgAPD+8kmm7lTJ4obG+KTBTk2I6rA 4D4H4oR7bcZlJI4CGh5ELJau2iEl2fLz0zzzaoedjbyQrYuuRuTV8T43Ohe+GjRYzvEi 3ZyDUHF4Tvx7u6+dskSkDYpjolEjllMC3TpGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HUjezO+WYSpek9/rOMecoXaai344HmD5UpRtvnR3R8tbrKCLsnY66mrm6VoKlFLgsL dzl6p4CYLiMA70jtdxeU10ChbQe1my7JrD+KE5k1WrU5/Tr5AqY1tjNVuiTlWarfxbZe CvPza+5xdiVcp6Jq8bT0dm/eaxldKGI1fSzV8= Original-Received: by 10.101.142.33 with SMTP id u33mr1084938ann.24.1259448930577; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:55:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87pr7genzj.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9719 Archived-At: Hi Ludo 2009/11/17 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s : > We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 1.9.5. I just tried 1.9.5 today, and am getting compile errors in my app, which I did not get in 1.8.6 or 1.9.0 : error: non-local function =E2=80=98static* opencog::SchemeSmob::ss_incoming_set(*)=E2=80=99 uses anonymous type and zillions of others. The following reproduces the bug: #include class SchemeSmob { private: static SCM ss_incoming_set(SCM); static void init(void); public: SchemeSmob(void); }; #define C(X) ((SCM (*) ()) X) void SchemeSmob::init(void) { scm_c_define_gsubr("cog-incoming-set", 1, 0, 0, C(ss_incoming_set))= ; } compiled without any flags.... Again, above compiles fine with 1.8.6 and I think it compiled with 1.9.0, not sure. --linas