unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com>
To: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>
Cc: Guile Development <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Locks and threads
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:34:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ae3aa420903251534g5a00cbb3mab34d4cf00dff2ee@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874oxhs124.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net>

2009/3/25 Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>:
> Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Well, once you identify the section that needs locking,
>> you'll want to use an rwlock instead of a mutex.  The
>> rwlock (pthread_rwlock_rdlock) allows multiple
>> simultaneous readers.  The writers, however, get
>> exclusive access. (pthread_rwlock_wrlock)
>
>  I don't want to add any significant performance
> penalty in that case.  And for that case, IIUC, there is no difference
> between a mutex and an rwlock.

If there's no perf difference, then isn't that an argument
*for* rwlock, instead of against it?

> Also I would guess that we would hit more portability issues in future
> with a rwlock than with a mutex.

Well, since rwlock is a part of posix threads, wouldn't it
be available universally (wherever posix threads are
available)?

Are you voicing some suspicion that its somehow
buggier, or less tested?

(I have no direct experience on these two perf/portability
issues myself).

--linas




  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-25 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-11 22:31 Locks and threads Neil Jerram
2009-02-11 23:05 ` Neil Jerram
2009-02-11 23:32   ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-02-11 23:30 ` Linas Vepstas
2009-02-11 23:53   ` Neil Jerram
2009-02-12  0:18     ` Linas Vepstas
2009-02-12 20:51     ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-02-11 23:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-02-12 12:55 ` Greg Troxel
2009-02-12 18:00   ` Ken Raeburn
2009-02-12 21:14     ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-02-14  1:25       ` Ken Raeburn
2009-02-14 16:09         ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-03-05 20:41   ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-04 23:49 ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-05  3:54   ` Linas Vepstas
2009-03-05 19:46     ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-05 20:05       ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-05 20:40         ` Linas Vepstas
2009-03-05 20:49           ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-05 20:57         ` Linas Vepstas
2009-03-05 21:25           ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-05 21:56             ` Linas Vepstas
2009-03-06 11:01               ` Andy Wingo
2009-03-06 12:36                 ` Linas Vepstas
2009-03-06 22:05                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-03-08 22:04               ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-25 19:00         ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-25 22:08           ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-03-05 21:35   ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-03-10 23:57   ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-12  0:07     ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-12  0:53       ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-12  1:29         ` Linas Vepstas
2009-03-12  3:09           ` Clinton Ebadi
2009-03-25 22:13           ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-25 22:34             ` Linas Vepstas [this message]
2009-03-12 22:13         ` Andy Wingo
2009-03-13 19:13           ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-25 23:19             ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-26  3:40               ` Linas Vepstas
2009-03-26  8:02                 ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-26 18:39                   ` Linas Vepstas
2009-03-26  9:10               ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-03-26 22:01                 ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-26 23:12                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-03-26 22:51               ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-27  3:15                 ` Linas Vepstas
2009-03-14 14:23           ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-03-16 22:57             ` Andy Wingo
2009-03-25 18:57     ` Neil Jerram

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ae3aa420903251534g5a00cbb3mab34d4cf00dff2ee@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linasvepstas@gmail.com \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=neil@ossau.uklinux.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).