From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dirk Herrmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Names for the C frame stuff Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:55:59 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <3FFFE84F.3030607@dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073741164 22881 80.91.224.253 (10 Jan 2004 13:26:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 10 14:26:00 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AfJ7o-0005jl-00 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:26:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AfJrZ-0004E8-9r for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 09:13:17 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AfJ9Z-00040X-Km for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:27:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AfIkF-0001E5-OS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:02:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.185] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AfIez-0000Xj-04 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 07:56:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AfHhP-0008Gl-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:54:39 +0100 Original-Received: from [80.131.35.136] (helo=dirk-herrmanns-seiten.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AfHhP-0003I8-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:54:39 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030821 X-Accept-Language: de, en Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:494e3e4d1bf8dc247959c49e6f1f4215 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3175 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3175 Marius Vollmer wrote: >so I'm pondering over how to name the functions that are associated >with the new 'frame' concept. I'm now mostly convinced to use these >ones: >[...] > > > scm_frame_unwind - Register a unwind handler > scm_frame_rewind - a rewind handler > I'd prefer to call these scm_frame_unwind_handler and scm_frame_rewind_handler. To me this would make it clearer that you are not _doing_ an unwind or a rewind, but are registering a handler for a later unwind or rewind. For the rest, I like the naming scheme and the names a lot. Best regards Dirk Herrmann _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel