From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miroslav Silovic Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GUILE GC -- Write barrier for vectors Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:36:37 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <3D32B3C5.5050204@puremagic.com> References: <15665.63423.468913.715296@blauw.xs4all.nl> <3D32AA5C.90600@puremagic.com> <15666.43843.623166.460512@meddo.cs.uu.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026732628 3470 127.0.0.1 (15 Jul 2002 11:30:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17U43f-0000tr-00 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:30:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17U43O-0001Zq-00; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 07:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01d.rapidsite.net ([207.158.192.52]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17U42d-0001Xw-00 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 07:29:23 -0400 Original-Received: from www.vams.com (207.201.150.210) by mail01d.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.63s) with SMTP id 02531; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 07:29:15 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Original-To: Han-Wen Nienhuys X-Loop-Detect: 1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:802 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:802 Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >I'm quite sure that free/malloc bytes reported are matched. However, >most counts are a little underestimated. This is impossible to >prevent, since we are using classes derived from smobbed C++ >baseclasses (You can't get correct object sizes in destructors and >constructors). > > > AFAIK, this shouldn't be the problem (it should only cause your memory usage to be larger than necessary). Did you try to monitor and compare GC frequencies on both machines (and log the bytes allocated etc.) ? Miro _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel