unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>
To: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@gmail.com>
Cc: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:42:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <33545F7E-7D6A-406F-8B15-501B050181E1@raeburn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikN8dKf+i60MRtxyWrbq=H3f7ALEtBU6tvjKfTJ@mail.gmail.com>

What platforms have sin_len in the generic sockaddr structure?  The one I've always seen is sa_len, and that's consistent with sa_family in terms of field name prefixes.

sockaddr         -> sa_
sockaddr_in      -> sin_
sockaddr_in6     -> sin6_
sockaddr_storage -> ss_

I suspect you'd do fine if you ditched the test for sockaddr.sin_len and tested either sockaddr_in.sin_len or sockaddr.sa_len.  (And I'd expect an OS to be consistent as to whether the _len field exists for each of the various socket address structures.)

At first glance, the IPv6 flavor of the code looks okay on this score...

Ken


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-13  5:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-07  6:28 Bug in Guile's Posix Networking Noah Lavine
2011-02-07 23:49 ` Andreas Rottmann
2011-02-12 20:47   ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-12 21:02     ` Andy Wingo
2011-02-12 21:35       ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-12 22:00         ` Andy Wingo
2011-02-13  1:22           ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-13  1:45             ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-13  2:22               ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-13  3:00                 ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-13  5:42                   ` Ken Raeburn [this message]
2011-02-13 13:55                     ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-13 13:57                       ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-13 18:34                       ` Ken Raeburn
2011-02-13 20:07                         ` Andy Wingo
2011-02-13 20:10                           ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-13 20:34                             ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-13 21:10                               ` Andy Wingo
2011-02-13 20:04                 ` Andy Wingo
2011-02-12 11:26 ` Andy Wingo
2011-02-12 20:33   ` Noah Lavine
2011-02-12 20:59     ` Andy Wingo
2011-02-12 21:00       ` Noah Lavine

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=33545F7E-7D6A-406F-8B15-501B050181E1@raeburn.org \
    --to=raeburn@raeburn.org \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=noah.b.lavine@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).