From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julian Graham Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: r6rs libraries, round three Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:47:26 -0500 Message-ID: <2bc5f8210911161247s394fbce9y52ae4da7922bef3e@mail.gmail.com> References: <2bc5f8210909261310q7a32ff83x8ebceb44a78d55c5@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210909302132w258d3f09tf1259bdfd6b1ca9e@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210910241210t11ee37a9o60f3991eb35eab55@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210910252053o31424493re2648f133bf7691f@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210911011126j66abb05ck57e0610903932146@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258404469 31277 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2009 20:47:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:47:49 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 16 21:47:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NA8U9-0000fn-FS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:47:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NA8U9-00087u-0x for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NA8U1-00084o-6e for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:47:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NA8Tw-0007x5-J9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:47:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39399 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NA8Tw-0007wp-E2 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:47:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com ([209.85.211.194]:32844) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NA8Tw-0004Nv-2z for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:47:28 -0500 Original-Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32so6834300ywh.14 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:47:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=h/gm+TlBEDtLf2InGaJF0d9F8ISrodJZsZDXbyGTMC0=; b=v3BoP20HhcIeJPM7Tkfvem4s+q7QCiXsOlJpNH4Y1e+/Gy1tyFS7r4ACWZWn3osiYO gF+f6uGwz8SHZFrfBz+0BJ3okTVQmA86w/gP+HaHNpn0dqBz6/NRREe2nJtPFU0pbdfm pYhJ9mQr/hW/GWJGEt2QFaIQvlGKerlD3m9cA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TrQc3DlEgrWk6ddvvxN2SGBksY9XGuB4tzP3yAn/pQot/V+5ctYMs8xYn40UpYvIU7 Drv21h21RK5jRU1qFvpFUF9Gt76eSY7Gj/Uj4WKyN9a8F6QtO28TwUagIZrxCAMBBXG3 cttefCQhsRhvyESDN/t8TxdWG+OX4TQPwzt4Q= Original-Received: by 10.213.102.65 with SMTP id f1mr1973505ebo.61.1258404446241; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:47:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2bc5f8210911011126j66abb05ck57e0610903932146@mail.gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9682 Archived-At: > As I said earlier, I'm happy to provide full documentation for all of > this code if the consensus is that I'm on the right track. Any feeling either way on those patches? I'm happy to create a remote tracking branch if that'd make it easier for people to review.