From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julian Graham Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: trace examples broken in master Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:37 -0400 Message-ID: <2bc5f8210909221834vb2a71sf45c0c22cd7258be@mail.gmail.com> References: <2bc5f8210907091222v6d3a3b8cqd91050a02b9d4f9c@mail.gmail.com> <87r5wj6626.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <87r5uty5qh.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <2bc5f8210908300810v7afae448x13b1acb88ce113b6@mail.gmail.com> <87ab1enwe4.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> <87ocpbrhzo.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <2bc5f8210909220728y64f338a3sb0cc936a33aacb6@mail.gmail.com> <87vdjag3aw.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253669696 12872 80.91.229.12 (23 Sep 2009 01:34:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 23 03:34:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MqGkq-0003JM-Vq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:34:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MqGkq-0006pS-Ak for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MqGkn-0006pF-DM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MqGkh-0006iP-Vn for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38179 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MqGkh-0006iI-Sm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com ([209.85.219.208]:56911) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MqGkh-000849-Fu for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:39 -0400 Original-Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so275908ewy.31 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:34:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O3l3OufCU3AAus29L1Zmp+yVF6uMUvysiEZ6mRbeGq8=; b=WS/sCxPz77VC97RMkI7CuaBup8Zq59TCRkroDHgd4haFa0ITBX+EeURGZjV6IPFV4+ 1BRQw520/QZjILud0/ySehPmn3eUek6BCf9POI4YpjMhFP2NztnfYKerZ3uN4HyxK/lY e4yVTsI4g4Hap09RyaYjU1p/xrx2fnab2D5Pk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uZPO4n9rcMUCFSJiwTWiAPpGzAeckLbt7EIf1L/Lsyh4G3WM5wJBSnh2gDBy5LI6EK Ky76YaUx4Mmn4n4dyPlqH2oLgobzAD0HLDw0kol+MOnc7Z11aCbiL/mofhwRAoTNkTxb dmsgvos8IQB3eQiI/Nnfz5aJYH5NftjnMymF0= Original-Received: by 10.210.2.17 with SMTP id 17mr1873928ebb.46.1253669678234; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:34:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87vdjag3aw.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9386 Archived-At: On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Neil Jerram wrote= : > Not that I'm aware of! =A0I just tried the transcript again, with current > master; no change from what I posted before, except that the version is > now 1.9.3, and the stack count incorrect warning has gone. > > One detail that I didn't say before: I'm starting Guile by running > `meta/guile -q' from the root directory of my working tree. =A0It's > possible, if you are starting Guile differently, that you could be > picking up either libraries or Scheme modules from outside the tree, and > hence which might not be up to date. Argh, yes, that was it. Thanks! I'll clean up my environment. Regards, Julian