[PATCH] let*-values in srfi-11 documentation

[PATCH] let*-values in srfi-11 documentation

[Julian Graham]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 200 bytes --]

Hi all,

Find attached a small patch that fixes a few instances of a typo in
the documentation for SRFI-11 -- the manual was incorrectly referring
to `let*-values' as `let-values*'.


Regards,
Julian

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Update-SRFI-11-docs-to-use-correct-name-for-let-val.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1935 bytes --]

From f725da157cabfc9575a6ffe21812182997088370 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Graham <julian@transmetropolitan.(none)>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:25:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Update SRFI-11 docs to use correct name for let*-values.

---
 doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
index b1fdde1..1fa50b2 100644
--- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
+++ b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ get the relevant SRFI documents from the SRFI home page
 * SRFI-8::                      receive.
 * SRFI-9::                      define-record-type.
 * SRFI-10::                     Hash-Comma Reader Extension.
-* SRFI-11::                     let-values and let-values*.
+* SRFI-11::                     let-values and let*-values.
 * SRFI-13::                     String library.
 * SRFI-14::                     Character-set library.
 * SRFI-16::                     case-lambda
@@ -1514,9 +1514,9 @@ the anonymous and compact syntax of @nicode{#,()} is much better.
 @cindex SRFI-11
 
 @findex let-values
-@findex let-values*
+@findex let*-values
 This module implements the binding forms for multiple values
-@code{let-values} and @code{let-values*}.  These forms are similar to
+@code{let-values} and @code{let*-values}.  These forms are similar to
 @code{let} and @code{let*} (@pxref{Local Bindings}), but they support
 binding of the values returned by multiple-valued expressions.
 
@@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ available.
 
 @code{let-values} performs all bindings simultaneously, which means that
 no expression in the binding clauses may refer to variables bound in the
-same clause list.  @code{let-values*}, on the other hand, performs the
+same clause list.  @code{let*-values}, on the other hand, performs the
 bindings sequentially, just like @code{let*} does for single-valued
 expressions.
 
-- 
1.5.6.3

Re: [PATCH] let*-values in srfi-11 documentation

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi Julian,

Julian Graham <joolean@gmail.com> writes:

> Find attached a small patch that fixes a few instances of a typo in
> the documentation for SRFI-11 -- the manual was incorrectly referring
> to `let*-values' as `let-values*'.

Applied, thanks!

Ludo'.