From: Julian Graham <joolean@gmail.com>
To: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] let*-values in srfi-11 documentation
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:21:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bc5f8210901202321x6b4a3926sa787f302b6527127@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 200 bytes --]
Hi all,
Find attached a small patch that fixes a few instances of a typo in
the documentation for SRFI-11 -- the manual was incorrectly referring
to `let*-values' as `let-values*'.
Regards,
Julian
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Update-SRFI-11-docs-to-use-correct-name-for-let-val.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1935 bytes --]
From f725da157cabfc9575a6ffe21812182997088370 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Graham <julian@transmetropolitan.(none)>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:25:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Update SRFI-11 docs to use correct name for let*-values.
---
doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
index b1fdde1..1fa50b2 100644
--- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
+++ b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ get the relevant SRFI documents from the SRFI home page
* SRFI-8:: receive.
* SRFI-9:: define-record-type.
* SRFI-10:: Hash-Comma Reader Extension.
-* SRFI-11:: let-values and let-values*.
+* SRFI-11:: let-values and let*-values.
* SRFI-13:: String library.
* SRFI-14:: Character-set library.
* SRFI-16:: case-lambda
@@ -1514,9 +1514,9 @@ the anonymous and compact syntax of @nicode{#,()} is much better.
@cindex SRFI-11
@findex let-values
-@findex let-values*
+@findex let*-values
This module implements the binding forms for multiple values
-@code{let-values} and @code{let-values*}. These forms are similar to
+@code{let-values} and @code{let*-values}. These forms are similar to
@code{let} and @code{let*} (@pxref{Local Bindings}), but they support
binding of the values returned by multiple-valued expressions.
@@ -1533,7 +1533,7 @@ available.
@code{let-values} performs all bindings simultaneously, which means that
no expression in the binding clauses may refer to variables bound in the
-same clause list. @code{let-values*}, on the other hand, performs the
+same clause list. @code{let*-values}, on the other hand, performs the
bindings sequentially, just like @code{let*} does for single-valued
expressions.
--
1.5.6.3
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-21 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 7:21 Julian Graham [this message]
2009-02-02 20:59 ` [PATCH] let*-values in srfi-11 documentation Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2bc5f8210901202321x6b4a3926sa787f302b6527127@mail.gmail.com \
--to=joolean@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).