From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Julian Graham" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: srfi-18 requirements Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:55:41 -0500 Message-ID: <2bc5f8210711281055x21ac0aeducf1632f16c1633e8@mail.gmail.com> References: <2bc5f8210710101854m1254160ei451026182b87e767@mail.gmail.com> <87lka8pvv3.fsf@laas.fr> <2bc5f8210710120831q5c90dcfes930595fa3eb16a77@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210710151526t6345200ao997988c1877e8cce@mail.gmail.com> <4713EB20.3080608@member.fsf.org> <2bc5f8210710151547l5e245ed1ucaf07e9006e95387@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210710290737j32fe7b1s86aaa7e084bb69b6@mail.gmail.com> <87ve7mmdpl.fsf@chbouib.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1196276176 29977 80.91.229.12 (28 Nov 2007 18:56:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:56:16 +0000 (UTC) To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?=" , "Guile Development" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 28 19:56:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IxS51-0005Nd-On for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:56:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxS4m-0002iV-B5 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:56:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IxS4W-0002c6-UK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:55:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IxS4V-0002bq-S1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:55:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxS4V-0002bj-Kr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:55:43 -0500 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IxS4V-0004JC-Ck for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:55:43 -0500 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1437991nfh for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:55:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=/4fr73SqgB4fA/wJOQHmOT8lgyXXzSY2VmTCZxRN8pw=; b=Zis3cCEs+33lXo92fH6HQJ0BRJmjq6RNglVQS9T7CxgVybXkNobpAr71nBesz3B3OUwhZhBMITGR6zY8QF7IAZ9pkb68YRllCU8cbYOPIHvWtRCcaSvb61NK+piB1s3w7l1jLTlYeyh/f11+TlwQdgY4N4nxJ6gSjO+6AnJBI9I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FI0/rcMRl9Emsd6TvN0QKmw1JPrmnAEaUevT30cNP5G7CbT2RbDqvx9Pux/sYrAzTCGyRQCuzIEwEBVGTrv5wNUlpNqM1W6sZ9rT+jbjgB9U13dO676lACXEN+Zju6oLF5IFNsLUjU0wHVET2ZV94R7GXGF9rBmtceuWmYuMMlA= Original-Received: by 10.82.121.15 with SMTP id t15mr2752540buc.1196276141173; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:55:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.82.166.1 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:55:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ve7mmdpl.fsf@chbouib.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6900 Archived-At: Hi Ludovic, Thanks so much for your comments! I'll try to address this stuff tonight. Stress-testing on NetBSD sounds good! Thanks, Julian On Nov 28, 2007 1:23 PM, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > Hi Julian, > > Overall, the patch looks good to me and your explanations were helpful. > The caveat is that I'm not familiar with SRFI-18 and not too comfortable > with these parts of the pthread API that you're wrapping, so I may well > overlook a few things here and there. I think we'll have to stress-test > the thing on NetBSD since it's good a catching thread-related > programming errors. > > My comments below are mostly cosmetic. Once you're done with them, > could you please provide a ChangeLog entry? > > Then we'll need to update the doc of the core API, and also add > documentation of the SRFI module itself (the custom has been to somewhat > duplicate SRFIs in the manual so that we have all documentation in one > place). _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel