From: "Julian Graham" <joolean@gmail.com>
To: "Neil Jerram" <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>
Cc: Guile Development <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:55:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bc5f8210710310755q59ca4ccao297a196112afc076@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874pg8w5wy.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net>
> From the recent experiments vs. Boehm GC, my impression was that
> Guile's GC is already pretty good and that there is little scope for
> improvement here.
Really? My (extremely unscientific) experiments were showing
something like <10ms for C->Guile calls that didn't involve GC, and
~100ms for ones that did.
> > * Not related to 1.9 itself, but maybe a cleanup / redesign of the web
> > page,
>
> Yes, in principle. Needs someone to volunteer though.
It might be worthwhile to put out a call to the GNU webmasters. Or
just post an ad on Savannah -- I actually got several responses to
something I posted looking for testers for SDOM, which has about zero
name recognition. I bet lots of people would be interested in getting
a chance to redesign Guile's page.
> Yes, that would be nice. Except I'm not keen on following Microsoft
> "standards". Java VM and/or Parrot (is that still happening?) would
> be fine.
Parrot had a new release two days ago. Whether they're still on
peoples' minds (and whether they're still gonna host Perl6), I dunno.
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-31 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <818B5317-4F09-46F3-9376-43292CEB3C16@iro.umontreal.ca>
[not found] ` <200710261850.l9QIo8Vu017241@garbo.cs.indiana.edu>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0710261701241.9685@tesseract.thetesseract.org>
[not found] ` <47229C5E.8070406@emf.net>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0710280508300.19352@tesseract.thetesseract.org>
2007-10-28 18:16 ` [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS Neil Jerram
2007-10-28 18:29 ` Elf
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0710281146460.32075@tesseract.thetesseract.org>
2007-10-28 19:28 ` Neil Jerram
2007-10-29 15:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-10-29 21:51 ` Neil Jerram
2007-10-30 9:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-10-30 15:01 ` Julian Graham
2007-10-30 23:15 ` Neil Jerram
2007-10-31 14:55 ` Julian Graham [this message]
2007-10-31 13:12 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-11-06 21:54 ` Neil Jerram
2007-11-11 15:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-11-12 20:29 ` Neil Jerram
2007-11-12 20:51 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-10-30 22:53 ` Neil Jerram
2007-10-31 10:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-11-02 20:53 ` Klaus Schilling
2007-11-03 11:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-11-03 17:49 ` Klaus Schilling
2007-10-30 23:55 ` Andy Wingo
2007-11-03 18:15 ` Klaus Schilling
2007-11-04 12:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2bc5f8210710310755q59ca4ccao297a196112afc076@mail.gmail.com \
--to=joolean@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=neil@ossau.uklinux.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).