From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: guile-vm .go files in GUILE_LOAD_PATH Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:57:19 -0400 Message-ID: <27940045.1016601221692239870.JavaMail.root@cdptpa-web21-z02> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1221692263 24807 80.91.229.12 (17 Sep 2008 22:57:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:57:43 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 18 00:58:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kg5yg-0005jA-AL for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:58:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44320 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kg5xf-0007IY-6l for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:57:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kg5xc-0007IT-Ec for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:57:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kg5xZ-0007IE-PD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:57:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35032 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kg5xZ-0007IB-JQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:57:21 -0400 Original-Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]:36467) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kg5xZ-0008QT-4R for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:57:21 -0400 Original-Received: from cdptpa-web21-z02 ([10.127.132.172]) by cdptpa-smta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20080917225719.GJWR6963.cdptpa-smta01.mail.rr.com@cdptpa-web21-z02> for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:57:19 +0000 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal X-Originating-IP: from 66.178.229.162 by webmail.roadrunner.com; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:57:19 +0000 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7712 Archived-At: I've been tracking the guile-vm branch lately and had a recent problem. After much head scratching we finally figured out that a previously installed .go file was being used during the buld. We (Andy and I on irc) hacked around it by creating a new environment variable that pre-inst-guile-env can use to override or disable things that libguile adds to the load-path. However, I think there is still a problem. Basically, a .go file will be preferred over a .scm file even if the .scm file is earlier in the load-path. I think that the file earlier in the load-path should win. Thoughts? -Dale