Op 02-07-2023 om 16:43 schreef Stefan Israelsson Tampe:
> It's part of the blog, computers tab, I see guile scheme as an art and 
> have a few suggestions of great improvements for it. But you have to 
> demand those features if you like it.

The article and blog post you sent does not contain anything about Guile 
Scheme -- there are blog posts that do contain stuff about Guile, but 
this wasn't one of them.

> And if you do not see we have some 
> serious issues in the world, just ignore it as much as you like. Enjoy 
> your sleep...

This is non-sequitur, because of the following reasons:

   1. Seeing or not seeing serious issues in the world does not have
      anything to do with the decision to ignore or not ignore the paper,
      because it is a physics paper, not a serious issues paper.

   2. I never said I ignored it -- in fact, I skimmed it to see if it
      contains anything about Guile or serious issues in the world, and
      it turned out that the article only contains physics, which while
      interesting, is not something I'm _personally_ interested in.

   3. I also did not ignore the top part of the e-mail
      (‘... The basis idea [...] and want us all to start doing
      something. Please copy to anyone that you think should read
      this.’).  It is one of the reasons I sent my question on why
      should guile-devel@gnu.org read this article unrelated to Guile.

   4. I asked why guile-devel@gnu.org is in the To, not whether it
      should be read or ignored.

More to the point, my issue with this is that apparently it is 
completely off-topic for Guile, because it is not about Guile at all, 
and in particular not about Guile development.  There exist many fora on 
which you could talk about such things (*), without resorting to chain 
mails.

(*) To list an example: 
<https://forums.sufficientvelocity.com/threads/welcome-to-science-technology.41297/>.

Best regards,
Maxime Devos