Op 10-06-2023 om 18:40 schreef Ludovic Courtès:
> Instead of using these UUIDs, I suggest using known unique objects,
> “unique” in the sense of ‘eq?’.
> 
> So it can be:
> 
>    (define repr-dot (make-symbol "repr-dot"))  ;uninterned symbol
> 

IIRC, in a previous reply, this was already asked, and the response was 
that this doesn't actually work because of reasons.

>> +                 ((and inunderscoreindent (and (not (equal? #\space next-char)) (not (equal? #\newline next-char))))
>> +                   (throw 'wisp-syntax-error "initial underscores without following whitespace at beginning of the line after" (last indent-and-symbols)))
> 
> I suggest using exception objects or SRFI-35 error conditions (they’re
> interchangeable) carrying information about the king of parsing error
> and its location.  That way, the user interface, such as the compiler,
> can produce helpful error messages (and internationalized, too).
Agreed.

 > [...]
> Can you make it LGPLv3+?  It’s a small file anyway.

Only if David A. Wheeler, Alan Manuel K. Gloria and Maxime Devos agrees. 
Otherwise, you still need to include the license text:

 > [...]
> +;;; The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> +;;; included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> [...]

and having both this license text and the LGPLv3+ stuff in the same file 
is messy (technically possible if done carefully, but messy).  As its a 
small file anyway, I don't think it's worth it unless everyone agrees to 
make in LGPLv3+.

As far as I'm concerned, I agree.

Best regards,
Maxime Devos.