From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] SRFI-19: Add support for ISO 8601 zones with a colon. Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:19:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20240411022752.7168991f@primary_laptop> References: <20240229212343.10442-1-GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> <87r0gnjj7h.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <20240311192508.5b974e64@trisquel64> <87r0g57ny8.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/NsNrD5xSZJH9toqQ3VTPZeE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27074"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Rob Browning Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 12 17:20:52 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rvIht-0006kM-27 for guile-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:20:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvIhY-0005i5-F7; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:20:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvIhT-0005ff-Qq for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:20:24 -0400 Original-Received: from cyberdimension.org ([2001:678:938:3ff::36] helo=rockpro64.cyberdimension.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvIhB-0003s6-59 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:20:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=dkim; bh=ebQd35sav9L5KrW kkpkl3BuJaUwCUWoo0qrNveZl6EQ=; h=references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to: from:date; d=cyberdimension.org; b=TCUu19QS3rEhXXRW15qw58NgqDsuZEOD2xR scnB6gYzaenOl3UbZSh/G7LInCUtK37r3xlqd6UgReOiI5v3yrfHfjObWFSWQv9QUI5N+Y 36w251msNM9Lp6+GzYnej/LSSCwiwxd0D9XkJg9Vp6euQEbyRDUotyIyZD6cyDGiL7Ic3c fwFTjiy0yXDEC9OR1fsYjbGOqyU2Q8mzDtDuHU6m1oyvBv9fdCkpCqCkKn4dzZrimMeAfl 311QAYbB0+N66yo0d0Z79hLFLqKDRYWvQYhmr7OUAQnkK/jg+NmqpuOOT1nI7Ig3NPL1VQ P6UKj2TTw/a6Pwag7lX89Hyi5Bg== Original-Received: from primary_laptop (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rockpro64.cyberdimension.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 27e08e94; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:19:30 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87r0g57ny8.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:678:938:3ff::36; envelope-from=GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org; helo=rockpro64.cyberdimension.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.devel:22386 Archived-At: --Sig_/NsNrD5xSZJH9toqQ3VTPZeE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:21:19 -0500 Rob Browning wrote: > Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli writes: >=20 > > Would something like that be OK instead?: >=20 > Not sure I understand the question. Were you asking if that'd be OK > elsewhere in the function too? I was just asking if my new version looked OK, especially because I'm new to scheme so I might have missed things I don't know about. Denis. --Sig_/NsNrD5xSZJH9toqQ3VTPZeE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEeC+d2+Nrp/PU3kkGX138wUF34mMFAmYZUPoACgkQX138wUF3 4mMutA//WMGukTJQfw2zBqoyrxeFYlu0qdmqPogyOJYk3lgUsLZ0FCxn9reOjkPP 8qq1Acqf2+4rkPChrIfT0hS1eQzmpp3beSykiBD3DXTVtULhEHsqe4TM15ogxuZN QgTdxvElQ+VYYiIQJppB55HU/EOMg+zvxcXJfginf7QDAE9Z6aWgtLLhwod1A1y2 i9CYk+gG0gKCdCVGp2y4XESlq6EUO0SRKRGn5HReAFlQ5IGJvgtFzO7GW5K6yaQb Dd/8GXo8+Sxh3kCyFTYonHpOrxA8DQdvJwr79pHZtlDastE0ttC6+7m/tBqVQWSp WFqtM3vVHB+WImlFYZJFaiYt16CDWNxHon3AfWitEbHmEzNdAl3EKQsII1mwrEef tx64QL/wIzMzLYUQPCeDpshSxjXvu/fTkDKlwd9H2SVFtvWm5xdKCqpElJPDwbH4 KG4ngVPyzQxps5ljUai9hn36INlC4KTOCBiLsy7DOm43gxpfTnUngELIinGPYGs8 GR7o+r+Q7yOlkOmUh4LFI6gAV44R4s400kQIEzDf09Zje4wFHVbqxmbpz7cCAqJX IZJjoz1PdNNSHhsHGv8fQrGjeP359qttNGDDTVbwNvVl/LT8zgiA7HA9RgJJBe8E 3V0PYYpbKUFCt0C62jOECov1+nCQ2W92dbZQyKVZW8Layc79uyM= =QbN8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/NsNrD5xSZJH9toqQ3VTPZeE--