From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Chris Vine Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile 3.0.3 released Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:36:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20200623103618.7baacc879e122002e3129084@gmail.com> References: <87imfk8724.fsf@gnu.org> <20200622215026.f231e44aea6973830cde8f35@gmail.com> <87sgem436o.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="101127"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: guile-user@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 23 11:38:29 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jnfNs-000QAQ-A8 for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:38:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58876 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnfNr-0003Hr-Ak for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:38:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33026) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnfLG-0007Nw-FW; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:35:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::430]:43704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnfLA-0002ng-Pv; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 05:35:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id l10so19779309wrr.10; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 02:35:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uRjIttsx+3rVnlOb5JVN/fGUZKg4C53W/OsFiuoPXyI=; b=Wo0st9qfSUvQM5R4RR1n/MKW2BxRHlRcIg4Zu746UJ5legCNzfN7S/gH0xLJ4brvS4 ylKMx0CPYO3E/VuIIv4cNa3KJ0he2Fqqvql9tPmbTvqahjTiFw2i/lTVNUQrf7VI1PaW vfDqgiHLEgSHEuxqjEX3t/gIbhpp9ZCUw+eeDq+N6ciH0GWU/DzLEPMdUnlyjQPeS4Xd sx2xHu+czZTwnoXnL9sl+ISbLcwljx/+eqkypwRKEjIsWSJlJDL//dtfYYvsZ246hl6f lN3EyCpmjIAlG9ZMN1Xm0nSXZB3WJygXhnt9GBrb62oFBFKbxPj0B4U+vTQwku4ajVZY qQnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uRjIttsx+3rVnlOb5JVN/fGUZKg4C53W/OsFiuoPXyI=; b=FvvaztBbZ1d06mIfmz6clKMnHHUo/Ko11DuiTbuSGpyFNaX81XM3cZKukNp07nGuBl y+7L51hnwAsCFJhEqdnb7ymyU6ytDKgHWS0n/ZuxuZRe9vEuqUS8DSU7gCZy5UI2R1Lz dSaQFZlKwYXXWqHlPzOuwDPFDAOzFzVLZc54aspis6Y5J6e5JNEmWgLGN3PAvZozeseC GvXJKMSxCEkfC4aBym7YzON20IDTacrhoNRlT63xPOv3whWLa4RmOARlzHFdHDqubFXH mPR4qUo3DgmbDi0+9zuypdwDD8pPQmr/rREy7hBdP/FIh/RI89w9Ayf0cPt88ChS1Huv LzOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533MuSmDGXGYDTTXhC/pAJDyWG2ANNdtaM0Q5x7tG4L2B96CbqSi 4PDgrXcliEXxKEbmK0mNlFdK7u0C X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxkvCS6L5XYIVgSYj+uHj8+8xaOH1LUiZQH9Ke6ihYPOa9u0yOWpOfIWTAe7owxrLxc6hMRNw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:634e:: with SMTP id b14mr11923372wrw.423.1592904938279; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 02:35:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bother.homenet ([2002:218:8d5e:10:13ce:f127:73fd:3d50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g195sm3021055wme.38.2020.06.23.02.35.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 02:35:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bother.homenet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bother.homenet (Postfix) with SMTP id DD874269CDE; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:36:18 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87sgem436o.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::430; envelope-from=vine35792468@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x430.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:16607 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:20545 Archived-At: On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:05:51 +0200 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Chris Vine skribis: > > > On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:04:03 +0200 > > Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> We are delighted to announce GNU Guile release 3.0.3, the third bug-fix > >> release of the new 3.0 stable series. This release represents 170 > >> commits by 17 people since version 3.0.2. See the NEWS excerpt that > >> follows for full details. > > [snip] > > > > This has a libguile so ABI jump from libguile-3.0.so.1 to > > libguile-3.0.so.3, which breaks my binaries linked to libguile. Is that > > normal for a micro update in the stable release series and if so can > > there be some warning in the announcement? > > Yes, it means you need to relink those binaries. > > I was hesitant about the SONAME: the ABI jump was unnecessary unless in > ‘--disable-deprecated’ builds. I erred on the side of cautiousness: > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=5d052c87bd8f0fd894e67f0bebd4fa6f6160d83c Hi, Ah right. There must have been two SO breaks between guile-3.0.2 and guile-3.0.3. It's a nuisance having SO bumps on micro releases and I wonder if that could be included in the announcement so that you don't first notice it when stuff fails to run? Chris