From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Chris Vine Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile 3.0.3 released Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:50:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20200622215026.f231e44aea6973830cde8f35@gmail.com> References: <87imfk8724.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="7244"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: guile-user@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 22 22:50:48 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jnTOy-0001o2-CS for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:50:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53208 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnTOx-0008NS-9G for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnTOj-0008NB-3H; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:50:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::435]:34170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnTOh-00036t-HD; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:50:32 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id v3so10649883wrc.1; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:50:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7cTY+IQPcISeqF1t/Hrb0+OQcPW5/E/D1PJitLoSOEc=; b=ZJe1IRKkjKM9zf/sMBp6LXLLqta0w+QKc4fQbuIZj8c48KhM9SO6xFIPXg1moBQgEe YGUr+Ae7iQR8s1zvYjTFSvf4oOXksjKH2pgz1T+T/H9zyfG62ZAGdgFV6vzzvoeOI3I8 2SoTO6aiFmK7sQ6s+JXFgCGk7+B6y6eglrootsGUcu/dkRg1qdgAJr2SVP1QtaG9z4q+ 7OIr6zSpT4IBzYOYzU/BJVT08Dxcy7/l2Ve+LsjTwyiYfs0HN9PI07nxX1p9EVjezxza ffuqQKbZA00UJ0ZYtYlfuoZO/HqTfM0CEYQMQ9JWAxCK3LKDu1wo07t1NViibcs27juK NgSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7cTY+IQPcISeqF1t/Hrb0+OQcPW5/E/D1PJitLoSOEc=; b=NOhog1zKORyD9pyxH5CCUN++qtBcTXu73GeJlY9aAL6PQ9AbR5FnfQ4UIDW3tbpbWc nPS8uf3WW+GVzembhPROjpVZIhOU6aa6ViQl748TRf51H3m+F6g/ACA4s1OEta2f/SMC TMc4klKJrgAOdVQmUt6fah9oQre8hYM4IOCuJi0VLoVWRFb2I8i/Q35uVIuOvxca/3JQ 9IJFxRxU9FO7JMkXzEI0GYuMVYYfJLJXDoT5mcJmp42T4jI785hf3ba2195z9/f2SL3p nSnkz80NQgN9Lb1gvnQLRUixhUW4IhFVaNQFtsxRSrcCFinX/InO7g7Tdxx8VBkh/phY tNLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zz9zk3MCg3W/mmtndN/7Zg4yJurPoMjJxjVFKPH0qSs8dTQa/ mZYJgBaf17PHmDUrHA/0UPs9AtCH X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8tED5nW9xwj+JeJ28CIqHUECyl9A2a/r0WhnCz3uB2f6ywxoOrbzszaH3sM12+EFZhJc/2A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6809:: with SMTP id w9mr22142867wru.182.1592859029116; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bother.homenet ([2.24.141.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o10sm19312587wrj.37.2020.06.22.13.50.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bother.homenet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bother.homenet (Postfix) with SMTP id 18B43269CDE; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:50:27 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87imfk8724.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::435; envelope-from=vine35792468@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x435.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:16604 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:20543 Archived-At: On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 23:04:03 +0200 Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > We are delighted to announce GNU Guile release 3.0.3, the third bug-fix > release of the new 3.0 stable series. This release represents 170 > commits by 17 people since version 3.0.2. See the NEWS excerpt that > follows for full details. [snip] This has a libguile so ABI jump from libguile-3.0.so.1 to libguile-3.0.so.3, which breaks my binaries linked to libguile. Is that normal for a micro update in the stable release series and if so can there be some warning in the announcement?