From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: conflicts in the gnu project now affect guile Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:09:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20191018150924.ykbltmpf3xq6fxzh@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="23491"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Cc: "guile-user@gnu.org" , "guile-devel@gnu.org" To: Todor =?utf-8?Q?Kondi=C4=87?= Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 18 17:27:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iLU9a-0005tN-JP for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:26:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41774 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLU9Z-0004id-BE for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:26:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLTsl-0008Dz-B8 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:09:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLTsk-0000nE-3a for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:52358 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLTsc-0000lA-Oc; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:09:27 -0400 Original-Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0E373604C5; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:09:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1571411364; bh=I1UroCOXVe+HSm65gGf5ad+Jh6u9POLjKErCbBtnsuE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=XUlPFyR4yi0TdSCL3bfWngp6nfol0AstQplJ977oILyhgrKENvJOHob/YBGdcHgNF DVubUj4piV/WKm/GuVJhLH18ZDGR8GhAD7o+L8TlsqfyTQqSUQRCv0ACCG4pvAPXIl wMuE4Cf32vyemMshWAU1J4Vs31ed29Avbv7L0bbs= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.45.111.108 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:15768 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:20114 Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:29:35AM +0000, Todor Kondi=C4=87 wrote: > You know, there is a big IT department within our institution and telli= ng them I will base some serious work on technologies such as GNU Guile = and Guix did raise a few eyebrows (those not raised are probably the caus= e of their proprietors not being informed enough). >=20 > [=E2=80=A6] > Couple of notes: >=20 > 1) Are there any ladies on these lists? I am *dying* to hear from them > 2) Related to (1) ... a brief look at the maintainers who signed the Jo= ined Statement gives an impression that it leans heavily to the political= ly Western hemisphere; just a comment, maybe food for thought > 3) The RMS scandal was brought to my attention by a female coder collea= gue who previously knew nothing of RMS's, or FSF's or GNU's work in the "= Open Source Community"; another nibble for thought > There have been few contributions from women, e.g. (I do not know what its status is), but I believe bringing GNU Guile to professional use could help diversify. Thank you for that! Regards, Florian