From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: srfi-1 take and drop seriously broken Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:18:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20161120101857.GA1721@tuxteam.de> References: <87vavjqici.fsf@gnu.org> <20161119215211.GA15707@tuxteam.de> <83vaviaks6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479637168 9928 195.159.176.226 (20 Nov 2016 10:19:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:19:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 20 11:19:25 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8PDU-00014y-Tt for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:19:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44315 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8PDY-0002WY-3y for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 05:19:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8PDG-0002VR-04 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 05:19:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8PDF-0000MX-3y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 05:19:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:52900 helo=tomasium.tuxteam.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8PDB-0000Ke-CA; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 05:19:01 -0500 Original-Received: from tomas by tomasium.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1c8PD7-0000Yf-KV; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:18:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83vaviaks6.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.199.139.25 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18756 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 05:32:25AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:52:12 +0100 > > From: > > > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 10:18:21PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > > Jan Synáček writes: > > > > > > > scheme@(guile-user)> ,use (srfi srfi-1) > > > > scheme@(guile-user)> (take (list 1 2 3) 4) [...] > > scheme@(guile-user)> (take (list 1 2 3 4) 4) > > $1 = (1 2 3 4) > > Your example has 4 members in the list, while the original one had > only 3. Ahem. Juxtaposing, and now that you say it :-) To be honest, the first example was Jan's, the second mine. In between there must have been some funky spell checker in my wetware (if you're taking four there's got to be at least four, right?). Thanks for pointing that out - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlgxeJEACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbcWgCfWMSWwVkOCoscrSpwirlDZ0gz MEAAn2QG43XO8UE0HtN1S574jY5J0FaF =6wCA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----