From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: anyone define port types? Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:58:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20160329075821.GB11537@tuxteam.de> References: <87y492mnjp.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459240402 7655 80.91.229.3 (29 Mar 2016 08:33:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:33:22 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 10:33:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1akp5L-0001yn-RW for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:33:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45172 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akp5K-0000EN-UW for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 04:33:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60275) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akp5E-0000DI-Nq for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 04:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akp58-0003Fa-Uz for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 04:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:35422 helo=tomasium.tuxteam.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akp58-0003FV-PU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 04:32:58 -0400 Original-Received: from tomas by tomasium.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1akoXe-0003Km-29 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:58:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y492mnjp.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 5.199.139.25 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18247 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 09:04:42PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote: > Hi! > > I am working on improving our port implementation to take advantage of > the opportunity to break ABI in 2.2. I am wondering how much I can > break C API as well -- there are some changes that would allow better > user-space threading > (e.g. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/14158/focus=15463 > or Chris Webber's 8sync). Yes, please! uh -- I mean... even if I had anything broken by that change I'd be very excited. Like it. thanks - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlb6NZ0ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZtzgCdFH4J5PD840WqWNSFNEI4wV/9 /cgAn2Twn7dhpXIX96+oydu6KLkjHlLF =8Ijx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----