From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rixed@happyleptic.org Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [bug #33996] 2.0.2: Crash related to ports and threads Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:32:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20111110093232.GA8455@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> References: <20110812-094212.sv11689.31911@savannah.gnu.org> <871uwjhxi2.fsf@pobox.com> <87r54ex5jn.fsf@gnu.org> <8762isdgyx.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320917577 10755 80.91.229.12 (10 Nov 2011 09:32:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:32:57 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 10 10:32:53 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ROR09-00021v-Gl for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:32:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34875 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ROR09-0004MZ-2V for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:32:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ROR03-0004Fe-G0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:32:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ROR02-0005Um-9D for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:32:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eneide.happyleptic.org ([213.251.171.101]:40485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ROR01-0005TQ-Tf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 04:32:46 -0500 Original-Received: from extranet.securactive.org ([82.234.213.170] helo=ccellier.rd.securactive.lan) by eneide.happyleptic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ROR5V-0007Q3-Ih for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:38:25 +0100 Original-Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ROQzo-0002Cz-T3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:32:32 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: rixed@happyleptic.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8762isdgyx.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.251.171.101 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12880 Archived-At: -[ Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:16:38AM +0100, Andy Wingo ]---- > > Indeed, it would probably need per-port mutexes, making I/O primitives > > thread-safe by default, and perhaps providing unlocked variants like > > libc does. > > I did this in master, but something was going wrong so I stubbed it out > for the time being. But we are almost there. Should I reopen the bug on debbug then?