From: "Chris K. Jester-Young" <cky944@gmail.com>
To: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: SRFI 9's default printer doesn't handle cyclic data structures
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:33:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110726033359.GA15555@yarrow.destinee.acro.gen.nz> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1135 bytes --]
[Crossposted from bug-guile@ since my message isn't posting there. :-(]
Hi there,
I've been playing around with Guile's implementation of SRFI 45 (which
uses SRFI 9), and have noticed something interesting: if you run the
following code in the REPL, printing out the value of the promise will
cause a stack overflow:
(use-modules (srfi srfi-45))
(define promise (delay promise))
(force promise)
#<promise val: module/ice-9/format.scm:38:0: In procedure format:
module/ice-9/format.scm:38:0: Throw to key `vm-error' with args `(vm-run "VM: Stack overflow" ())'.
However, if I change the SRFI 45 code to use Guile's native records,
it prints correctly:
#<promise val: #<value tag: eager proc: #-1#>>
For reproducibility, I attached the diff to make SRFI 45 use Guile
native records.
So, it seems like SRFI 9's record printer doesn't handle cycles in the
record data very well. Unfortunately I don't know how to fix this (I
tried looking at the printer for Guile's native records, but couldn't
figure out what made it special enough to handle cycles correctly), so
no fix is attached.
Many thanks,
Chris.
[-- Attachment #2: srfi-45.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1207 bytes --]
--- module/srfi/srfi-45.scm 2011-02-08 22:38:34.000000000 -0500
+++ module/srfi/srfi-45.scm 2011-07-23 20:24:51.000000000 -0400
@@ -37,15 +37,21 @@
lazy
force
eager)
- #:replace (delay force)
- #:use-module (srfi srfi-9))
+ #:replace (delay force))
-(define-record-type promise (make-promise val) promise?
- (val promise-val promise-val-set!))
+(define <promise> (make-record-type "promise" '(val)))
+(define make-promise (record-constructor <promise>))
+(define promise? (record-predicate <promise>))
+(define promise-val (record-accessor <promise> 'val))
+(define promise-val-set! (record-modifier <promise> 'val))
-(define-record-type value (make-value tag proc) value?
- (tag value-tag value-tag-set!)
- (proc value-proc value-proc-set!))
+(define <value> (make-record-type "value" '(tag proc)))
+(define make-value (record-constructor <value>))
+(define value? (record-predicate <value>))
+(define value-tag (record-accessor <value> 'tag))
+(define value-tag-set! (record-modifier <value> 'tag))
+(define value-proc (record-accessor <value> 'proc))
+(define value-proc-set! (record-modifier <value> 'proc))
(define-syntax lazy
(syntax-rules ()
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-26 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-26 3:33 Chris K. Jester-Young [this message]
2011-07-26 3:45 ` SRFI 9's default printer doesn't handle cyclic data structures nalaginrut
2011-07-26 4:56 ` nalaginrut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110726033359.GA15555@yarrow.destinee.acro.gen.nz \
--to=cky944@gmail.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).