is this better? /Stefan On Monday 24 May 2010 10:08:58 pm Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello! > > stefan writes: > > On Saturday 22 May 2010 11:03:12 pm Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> stefan writes: > >> > Shall we say that we use the slightly modified version of (ice-9 > >> > match) that ypu dug up for now! > >> > >> Hmm, yes? Please send an actual patch against Guile master, so we have > >> something concrete do discuss. :-) > > > > In this mail a patch is made for discussions. It's not upstream ready > > but intended for further discussions. > > Thanks! Your patch inserts a modified version of Shinn’s match as > (ice-9 match). I’d prefer to have the upstream version unmodified, say > as ‘match.upstream.scm’, and have ‘match.scm’ just ‘include-from-path’ > that file, along with defining any necessary macros for compatibility > (see, e.g., how ‘sxml/ssax.scm’ does that.) > > Could you look into it? > > Thanks, > Ludo’. >