From: <dsmich@roadrunner.com>
To: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>,
Guile User <guile-user@gnu.org>,
Neil Jerram <neiljerram@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Killing off scm_init_guile for Guile 2.0 ?
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:32:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090116213215.YITDV.179685.root@cdptpa-web09-z02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49dd78620901151530o66a2641ax47e526d15fc09faf@mail.gmail.com>
---- Neil Jerram <neiljerram@googlemail.com> wrote:
> scm_init_guile has always been a bit problematic, as it requires lots
> of heuristic and OS-dependent code to try to determine where the base
> of the stack is. It's never been formally deprecated, but we have
> always advised people to use scm_boot_guile or scm_with_guile if they
> can, and the manual says:
>
> The function `scm_init_guile' might not be available on all
> platforms since it requires some stack-bounds-finding magic that
> might not have been ported to all platforms that Guile runs on.
> Thus, if you can, it is better to use `scm_with_guile' or its
> variation `scm_boot_guile' instead of this function.
[ ... ]
> Thoughts? On the other hand, does moving to BDW-GC take a lot of this
> out of our hands anyway? In any case, it would be interesting to hear
> whether people think that scm_init_guile is really needed.
Iirc, scm_init_guile is mainly used when you do not have access to main(), for example writing a module for apache. Generally, when you want to add Guile to an already existing application that has plugins or extension modules via .so's.
-Dale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-16 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-15 23:30 Killing off scm_init_guile for Guile 2.0 ? Neil Jerram
2009-01-15 23:48 ` Neil Jerram
2009-01-16 14:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-01-16 3:59 ` Linas Vepstas
2009-01-16 15:00 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-01-16 15:41 ` Bill Schottstaedt
2009-01-23 1:49 ` Neil Jerram
2009-01-16 21:32 ` dsmich [this message]
2009-01-17 1:36 ` Linas Vepstas
2009-01-21 21:52 ` Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
2009-01-23 2:02 ` Neil Jerram
2009-01-23 6:13 ` Clinton Ebadi
2009-01-23 16:23 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-01-23 16:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090116213215.YITDV.179685.root@cdptpa-web09-z02 \
--to=dsmich@roadrunner.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
--cc=neiljerram@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).