From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David =?UTF-8?B?U8OpdmVyaW4=?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Plan for 2.0 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:22:18 -0200 Organization: Alto Air Services [http://www.altosw.be/aas/] Message-ID: <20090109122218.4134675e@altosw.be> References: <49dd78620901031038i6f6c678o5cebc21b217374d2@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231518075 25310 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2009 16:21:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: "Neil Jerram" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 09 17:22:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LLK7q-0003ga-OL for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:22:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40653 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LLK6W-0007dR-FX for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:21:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LLIFp-00053z-Cd for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:22:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LLIFm-000534-Fb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:22:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41707 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LLIFl-00052f-43 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:22:25 -0500 Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.158]:15571) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LLIFk-00081Q-Rw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:22:24 -0500 Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so3182672ywk.66 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:22:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:to:cc:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:organization:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=R1DdGECZsYOEhlMWqIp6z++AIZ4qBZ9ZlM+/vIz56Us=; b=GzrifHGGXAYMRXCShPNQyggJj2XRLjd0UXbaOCwVBtBKuqCephyFPZc1v94zHw76Nj EIAfBX2c6JPwmdIshlVdtdYQfQyGRJYPRBTbGKIRX/oWzbVVDoQlN4EvTWQdtOuskJJO jkgCTKs1TzQSXERGK2BnuM5Soo0iJ4FFvXZRs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=GDmumgxo1tj+5SkCxIAQnUxoRHZoYSHSoiwZiusEhzze1d1Nq2OHDoo9hFxobsLg6f 8GVTMuE9yZwmTg6m3Uf43IPSRxbrjUgdBHD8+rJfNaOe5M42nk08AEH4Q20WMoSQaRN5 L61G+h/telvv1XH5I5ACRw7eU/rRwyO7/NsEA= Original-Received: by 10.101.67.11 with SMTP id u11mr13790679ank.88.1231510942995; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:22:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain ([201.19.26.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d22sm42038056and.0.2009.01.09.06.22.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:22:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49dd78620901031038i6f6c678o5cebc21b217374d2@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:20:47 -0500 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7977 Archived-At: Le Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:38:13 +0000, "Neil Jerram" a =C3=A9crit : > We're clearly moving towards a 2.0 release. Here is my attempt to > pull that together a bit and flesh out what needs to be done. >=20 > What will go into 2.0: Hi Guilers, Don't you think that the 'using thread' on debian [and other distro?] shoul= dn't be solved before to call a release '2.xx'? David