* r6rs
@ 2007-09-22 10:19 Klaus Schilling
2007-09-23 10:14 ` r6rs Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Schilling @ 2007-09-22 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-devel
Are the guile maintainers going to implement the recently ratified
R6RS? Or are just some parts provided eclectically,
as a few other Scheme implementors are going to,
such as SCM, Chicken, Gambit, MIT-Scheme ?
Klaus Schilling
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: r6rs
2007-09-22 10:19 r6rs Klaus Schilling
@ 2007-09-23 10:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2007-09-23 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-devel
Hi,
Klaus Schilling <schilling.klaus@web.de> writes:
> Are the guile maintainers going to implement the recently ratified
> R6RS?
I have an implementation of R5.92RS bytevectors and related binary I/O
procedures [0], which I'm going to "upgrade" to R6RS. I'm inclined to
eventually include it in Guile HEAD, if others agree.
I'm not aware of anyone planning to work on other parts of R6RS, though.
I think having R6RS modules would be nice, but there's some work to do
before we can consider working on it.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
[0] http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/guile/guile-r6rs-libs-0.0.tar.gz
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: r6rs
@ 2007-09-29 4:57 可冰
2007-10-01 1:24 ` r6rs Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: 可冰 @ 2007-09-29 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-devel
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> I'm not aware of anyone planning to work on other parts of R6RS, though.
> I think having R6RS modules would be nice, but there's some work to do
> before we can consider working on it.
How about an implementation of the R6RS since it has been released?
(see http://www.r6rs.org) I am going to learn it for participate to the
development. Almost 6 months before I implemented a simple implementation
of some basic parts of R5RS and I just enjoyed it.
Thanks,
kebing
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: r6rs
2007-09-29 4:57 r6rs 可冰
@ 2007-10-01 1:24 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2007-10-01 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-devel
Hi,
"可冰" <kebing.zh@gmail.com> writes:
> How about an implementation of the R6RS since it has been released?
Well, anyone is free to participate, so I guess your contribution would
be welcome! :-)
But again, some ground work is required before some parts of R6RS can be
implemented (modules with phase separation, Unicode, etc.).
Thanks,
Ludovic.
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-01 1:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-22 10:19 r6rs Klaus Schilling
2007-09-23 10:14 ` r6rs Ludovic Courtès
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-29 4:57 r6rs 可冰
2007-10-01 1:24 ` r6rs Ludovic Courtès
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).