From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Ellcey Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Snapshot of ToT? Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:16:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <200611131916.LAA06922@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Reply-To: sje@cup.hp.com NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163445603 20075 80.91.229.2 (13 Nov 2006 19:20:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 13 20:19:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjhLa-0002dz-HG for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:19:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjhLZ-0001sx-Lp for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GjhKr-0001SJ-Cg for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:19:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GjhKp-0001RK-Kd for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:19:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjhKp-0001RG-8e for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:19:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [156.153.255.238] (helo=palrel13.hp.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GjhKp-0003U4-16 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:19:11 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp2.cup.hp.com (smtp2.cup.hp.com [15.4.32.118]) by palrel13.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403F135B13 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:16:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from hpsje.cup.hp.com (hpsje.cup.hp.com [16.89.92.85]) by smtp2.cup.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF15E2DB6FF for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: (from sje@localhost) by hpsje.cup.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA06922 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:16:01 -0800 (PST) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6216 Archived-At: I am trying to test the latest guile-core on IA64 HP-UX but I see there is no recent snapshot for ToT. Is there a reason why there are nightly snapshots of the 1.6 and 1.8 branches but no recent snapshot of ToT? The one at ftp://ftp.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/pub/guile/snapshots is from Aug 28. I did a CVS checkout of Top-of-Tree but running autogen.sh did not result in a usable guile-core configure script. I'd like to just get an up-to-date snapshot so I wouldn't have to mess around with the auto* tools and could just try a configure and build. Is the lack of a recent ToT snapshot intentional or accidental? Steve Ellcey sje@cup.hp.com _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel