From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stanislav Ievlev Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:26:17 +0400 Message-ID: <20061013062617.GD8294@basalt.office.altlinux.org> References: <20061010063445.GA30335@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <87slhw60l8.fsf@laas.fr> <20061011110153.GA12594@basalt.office.altlinux.org> <87r6xdher1.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160720794 12513 80.91.229.2 (13 Oct 2006 06:26:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ldv@altlinux.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 13 08:26:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYGUy-0003Yl-MD for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:26:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYGUy-00071N-1J for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:26:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GYGUu-00070B-M1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:26:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GYGUs-0006zF-Po for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:26:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GYGUs-0006z4-LK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [217.16.24.5] (helo=mh.altlinux.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GYGdG-00004w-ML for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: from basalt.office.altlinux.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mh.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103AE382CE51 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:26:17 +0400 (MSD) Original-Received: by basalt.office.altlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 502) id 247D8B0D90; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:26:17 +0400 (MSD) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r6xdher1.fsf@laas.fr> X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6149 Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:58:58PM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote: > Hi, > > Stanislav Ievlev writes: > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:23:31AM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Stanislav Ievlev writes: > >> > >> > : In expression (vector-length syntmp-x-1008): > >> > : Stack overflow > >> > >> Did you compile with `-O0'? If so, make sure you compile at least with > >> `-O1'. > > You have problems with optimization disabled? > > Personally, no. ;-) But Guile eats up a lot of stack space when > compiled with `-O0', to the point that you can't get to the REPL (with > the default stack limit), hence my suggestion to use `-O1'. > > > However, guile does not build with glibc >=2.4 when -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 is > > added to CFLAGS: > > I was unaware of that flag. Is it documented somewhere? As I understand, this is one of security features from RedHat gcc branch. http://www.redhat.com/magazine/006apr05/features/security/ _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel