From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: steven mestdagh Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: undefined reference to `scm_init_guile' Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:41:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20060310064102.GA11885@esat.kuleuven.be> References: <87u0a7tfex.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142024578 9263 80.91.229.2 (10 Mar 2006 21:02:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 10 22:02:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHoki-0006Re-2h for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:02:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHokh-0003lZ-EV for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:02:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FHbJI-0006SB-OV for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FHbJD-0005zk-BN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:41:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHbJC-0005th-Nu for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:41:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [134.58.240.41] (helo=nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FHbMR-0002sI-4a for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:44:27 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1BA4D0F8; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:41:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp02.kuleuven.be (lepidus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.72]) by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE584D06C; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:41:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp02.kuleuven.be (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7102CAAF6; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:41:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from nijl.esat.kuleuven.be (nijl.esat.kuleuven.be [134.58.56.153]) by smtp02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0C82CAAE8; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:41:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ohm.esat.kuleuven.be (ohm.esat.kuleuven.be [134.58.63.167]) by nijl.esat.kuleuven.be (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2A6f3s8026156; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:41:03 +0100 Original-Received: from ohm.esat.kuleuven.be (smestdag@localhost.esat.kuleuven.be [127.0.0.1]) by ohm.esat.kuleuven.be (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2A6f3Jx011802; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:41:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (from smestdag@localhost) by ohm.esat.kuleuven.be (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k2A6f3JZ010755; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:41:03 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Neil Jerram Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87u0a7tfex.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:55:23 -0500 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5768 Archived-At: Neil Jerram [2006-03-09, 22:35:34]: > >> We should fix test-num-integral so that it still builds in that case, > >> of course. Do you also need scm_init_guile for your own programs? > > > > no, I was just trying to upgrade the OpenBSD port for guile to version > > 1.8.0, and it would be cool if the tests work. > > Thanks. What is the Guile version of the existing OpenBSD port? it's 1.6.7. > (It's easy enough to fix the tests to use scm_with_guile instead, but > I'm concerned that we've unintentionally removed scm_init_guile, as > far as OpenBSD is concerned, without passing through any deprecation > phase; so it would probably be better to make scm_init_guile continue > to work.) i was planning to test build ports depending on guile, so anything that uses scm_init_guile will error out. i'll let you know. steven Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel