From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de (Tomas Zerolo) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Exposing `scm_i_mem2number ()' Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20060216121735.GA28174@www.trapp.net> References: <87d5holin9.fsf@laas.fr> <874q30z3nr.fsf@zagadka.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0448777756==" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140110993 16310 80.91.229.2 (16 Feb 2006 17:29:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 16 18:29:51 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F9mwW-0008D3-Ih for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:29:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F9mwU-00026S-Qe for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:29:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F9icJ-0005oG-9Q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:52:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F9iU2-0003cV-DG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:43:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F9iAg-0006vO-7I for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:23:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [217.22.192.104] (helo=www.elogos.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F9iFn-00006h-Mi for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:28:59 -0500 Original-Received: from www.elogos.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.elogos.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202C4DB056; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:17:36 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 4000) id 12CD4DB260; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:17:36 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <874q30z3nr.fsf@zagadka.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5722 Archived-At: --===============0448777756== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN" Content-Disposition: inline --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote: [...] > But, what about scm_string_to_number (scm_from_locale_string (...))? > Isn't that good enough? Alas, attractive as it is it won't work: number representations vary across locale settings (basically, it's decimal point and thousands separator :-( Regards -- tom=E1s --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD9G1fBcgs9XrR2kYRAou0AJ0WhVjKjDv1wSHwvWlBOaAU+XMaoQCfT2u8 20Nu28VSXbjQOuzIp2zjXPw= =Rzuh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN-- --===============0448777756== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel --===============0448777756==--