From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bruno Haible Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: i18n, gettext support Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 18:37:14 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200409081837.14073.bruno@clisp.org> References: <200408202226.10769.bruno@clisp.org> <200409081239.23769.bruno@clisp.org> <87acw0hln3.fsf@peder.flower> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094665331 7973 80.91.224.253 (8 Sep 2004 17:42:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 08 19:41:52 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C55W3-00012s-00 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 18:41:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C55bF-0001tp-IN for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:47:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C55bC-0001tG-Di for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C55bA-0001sm-QD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C55bA-0001sj-KC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.80.162.195] (helo=ftp.ilog.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C55V6-0003V6-P4; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:40:53 -0400 Original-Received: from laposte.ilog.fr (cerbere-qe0 [81.80.162.193]) by ftp.ilog.fr (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i88GeoQC015484; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 18:40:51 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: from honolulu.ilog.fr ([172.16.15.122]) by laposte.ilog.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i88GeiIp007892; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 18:40:44 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by honolulu.ilog.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BDA3B3C1; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen User-Agent: KMail/1.5 In-Reply-To: <87acw0hln3.fsf@peder.flower> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4106 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4106 Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > I don't understand. If that's forbidden, d*gettext will tell you that, It's forbidden. dcgettext will not do what people expect when they try to use it. > why add an extra check? In order to tell people that they are writing buggy code when they write (gettext string LC_ALL). There's no difference between LC_ALL and -761 in this respect: both are invalid. Bruno _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel