From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: tomas@fabula.de
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general,gmane.lisp.guile.devel
Subject: Re: Auto(conf|make) style questions
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 09:32:32 +0100
Sender: autoconf-bounces+gnu-autoconf=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <20030322083231.GA18149@www>
References: <20030319172104.GA6109@www><20030320080401.GC8975@www>
	<2003-03-21-21-17-17+14579+duret_g@lrde.epita.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1048320713 2164 80.91.224.249 (22 Mar 2003 08:11:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 08:11:53 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: autoconf-bounces+gnu-autoconf=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 22 09:11:52 2003
Return-path: <autoconf-bounces+gnu-autoconf=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18we6a-0000Ym-00
	for <gnu-autoconf@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 09:11:52 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18we5i-0005h3-02
	for gnu-autoconf@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:10:58 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18we4w-0005b8-00
	for autoconf@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:10:10 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18we4u-0005XB-00
	for autoconf@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:10:08 -0500
Original-Received: from [217.22.192.104] (helo=www.elogos.de)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18we4t-0005PS-00; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:10:07 -0500
Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 5002)
	id 4122D14080; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 09:32:32 +0100 (CET)
Original-To: Alexandre Duret-Lutz <duret_g@lrde.epita.fr>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2003-03-21-21-17-17+14579+duret_g@lrde.epita.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Original-cc: autoconf@gnu.org
Original-cc: rm@fabula.de
X-BeenThere: autoconf@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the autoconf build system <autoconf.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>,
	<mailto:autoconf-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/autoconf>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>,
	<mailto:autoconf-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: autoconf-bounces+gnu-autoconf=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general:2397 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2100
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2100

On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 09:17:17PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "tomas" == tomas  <tomas@fabula.de> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
>  >> NEON_COMPAT="$NEON_COMPAT scm_c_string2str.lo"
>  tomas>                                       ^^^^       EEEK! ;-)
> 
> [...]
> 
>  tomas> If I understand the configury documentation correctly -- isn't using
>  tomas> explicit dynamic object endings a ``Don't Do That?'' and exactly what
>  tomas> $(LIBOBJS) or $(LTLIBOBJS) is supposed to handle for you? For .lo is
>  tomas> platform specific...
> 
> No.  `.lo' is portable.  What wasn't portable in the way people used
> to define LTLIBOBJS from LIBOBJS was the hardcoding of `.o'.

Ah, I stand corrected. Thanks a lot for the clarification. Then your suggestion
makes indeed a lot of sense.

Regards
-- tomas