From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rm@fabula.de Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: some rpm building questions Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:08:21 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <20021004130821.GB20754@www> References: <1033682765.2197.59.camel@li.mine.nu> <1033698046.2059.140.camel@li.mine.nu> <87ofaatmib.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033735933 25982 127.0.0.1 (4 Oct 2002 12:52:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bo Forslund , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17xRwC-0006kw-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:52:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xRw5-0007BB-00; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17xRvg-00070c-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17xRve-0006x7-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:51:39 -0400 Original-Received: from www.elogos.de ([212.18.192.92]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xRvd-0006sG-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:51:37 -0400 Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 5001) id C7A8910482D; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:08:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Marius Vollmer Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ofaatmib.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1433 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1433 On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:30:04PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote: > Bo Forslund writes: > > > The spec ended up packing like this. Is it OK? > > I think Rob can comment on this better than I can. > > > And how about ltdl? Can the old one be replaced? Can libtool use > > this libltdl if the old one is replaced? > > We are going to release a Guile-1.6.1 soon (hopefully) that does not > use a conflicting libltdl. You may want to wait for this. > Alternatively, if the RPM format allows this, you can replace the old > libltdl with the one from Guile. It is completely compatible and only > fixes a few (significant) bugs. Are you shure about this? If i understand it right it changes the behavior of libltdl, or? There might be apps (admittedly, broken) that depend on exactly this behaviour. Ralf P.S.: i might be playing devil's advocate here, but if some apps start loding different libs after installation of the "better" libltdl Bo might have some serious problems. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel