unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jeff Read" <bitwize@snet.net>
Subject: Re: SRFI-25 -- multi-dimensional array support.
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 22:14:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020914221450.A3765@gas-o> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87elbwwdwu.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>; from rlb@defaultvalue.org on Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 02:48:33PM -0500

On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 02:48:33PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
>   2) Is our array type close enough to be used as the underlying data
>      type for srfi-25?

I'm not sure... but it seems like this SRFI might be useful in deriving an array datatype that's abstract enough to handle dense or sparse arrays.

> 
>   4) In the *long* run do we try to merge our API with that of the
>      srfi or keep both APIs/datatypes and keep them separate?

It is my hope that the more adaptable of the two implementations (SRFI, Guile) will subsume the other to the greatest extent possible. Having different datatypes floating around that do essentially the same thing in most cases is inconsistent with Scheme's general linguistic cleanliness.

In the meantime, I think the best thing to do would be to have the SRFI implementation be optionally loadable, and its API override Guile's, or vice-versa.

>   5) Less importantly -- in the long run, should our built-in
>      multi-dimensional array support remain built-in or should it
>      become an add-on like the srfi, either a compile-time or run-time
>      add-on?  We've found that Guile is quite useful on small
>      platforms, and that tends to lead one to think about
>      customizability (i.e. to consider arrangements that would allow
>      small core + add-ons as needed).

Personally I like this idea. I use Guile as kind of a go-anywhere (well, anywhere there's POSIX) utility language, primarily. The ability to optionally remove extended functionality to get Guile into those hard-to-reach spots would be a welcome feature.

-- 
Jeffrey T. Read
"I fight not for me but the blind babe Justice!" --Galford


_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-15  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-14 19:48 SRFI-25 -- multi-dimensional array support Rob Browning
2002-09-15  2:14 ` Jeff Read [this message]
2002-09-15 21:20 ` Christopher Cramer
2002-09-22 20:34   ` Gary Houston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020914221450.A3765@gas-o \
    --to=bitwize@snet.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).